Central Coast Dispatch

The Curtains Close On America

2008-07-18T23:25:00.000-07:00

No one can make an honest living anymore or simply hold on to a modest parcel of property on which to live and raise their family without fear of being eaten alive by economic predators - whether it's through taxation of everything we need to survive - from property to milk to gas to the clothes that we put on our backs - or by outright theft through pyramid schemes legalized by state legislatures or the courts bought off and bribed by the local arms of international corporate gangsters.

All the while Americans are walking around dazed and confused as if in a drunken stupor - not knowing who they are or why they exist and struggling just to survive or to find someone to love to make their miserable existence worthwhile.

The great Hoax of Home Ownership. Even when the loan is paid off, you owe taxes on it until the day you Die. You don't own your property, You lease it from the government.

The Jewish Role in Destroying America

2008-07-06T21:18:00.001-07:00

by James Buchanan

Throughout history Jews always invaded the richest nation, that is willing to let them in. For thousands of years, Jews moved from Egypt to Persia to Babylon always in pursuit of a rich host population that they could exploit. Jews always try to ingratiate and entrench themselves in their host nation. Jewish women try to become the wife or mistress of the king, emperor or president. Jewish advisers worm their way up, trying to become powerful advisers. (Remember Henry Kissinger, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Reich.) American presidents from FDR to George W. Bush have been surrounded by Jewish advisers.

The Jews are a race, not a religion. They have alien characteristics and morality. There is a much greater proportion of homosexuals in the Jewish population. Jews -almost universally- believe that homosexuality should be protected and tolerated while in most of Europe for thousands of years homosexuality was seen an an extreme perversity that was punished severely. The Jews only seem to feel comfortable if they are surrounded by dozens of other races or “Diversity” as they like to call it. Most White people would be perfectly happy to live in an all-White society, but Jews keep using their political influence and power to invite millions of Latinos, Africans and Hindus into America –against the will of the White host population.

The Jews are typically middlemen, lawyers and usurers who grow rich off the host population, often reducing the host people to poverty. Sometimes the host population rebels against the Jews. One famous example involved the Persians. Persian nationalists grew tired of Jewish usurers and they had persuaded the Persian king to set a deadline for the Jews to leave Persia. Jewish historians claim that the Persian nationalists wanted to “kill” the Jews. This -by the way- is another characteristic of the Jews. They always exaggerate their suffering or the threat to their population. The Jews don’t want to admit that one nation after another has expelled them as “undesirables.” Instead, according to the Jews, “hateful irrational” people throughout history have repeatedly persecuted them “for no reason.” A Jewish woman, Esther, seduced the Persian King, who then executed all the anti-Semites, who wanted to expel the Jews. The Jews celebrate this slaughter of their enemies as the Feast of Purim.

The Jews have been expelled from every nation in Europe at least once. Spain expelled the Jews in 1492. The Spanish people then enjoyed a Golden Age of exploration and discovery once the Jews were gone. Germany removed the Jews from power in 1933. Germany then enjoyed a great cultural renaissance and was the first White nation to pull itself out of the Great Depression.

The Jews of course could not tolerate a White nation -free of Jews- enjoying prosperity while the Jew-controlled nations of the world were still locked in a depression. The Jews began a propaganda campaign against Germany. The Jewish World Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. The Jews began using their media in Britain and France to push for war against Germany. Territories stolen from Germany after World War One were stubbornly withheld. Poland held a rich coal field in Silesia as well as a “corridor” that cut off East Prussia from the rest of Germany. When Poland refused to return these German territories in 1939, Hitler invaded Poland to recover that territory. Britain and France then used this incident as an excuse to declare war on Germany.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was discovered by a Russian spy and translated into English in 1905. The Protocols are a master plan by which Jews control Gentile nations and push them into war for Jewish interests. The great inventor and industrialist Henry Ford studied the Protocols and said that they “fit history.” Protocol 7 proclaims “Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations… We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.”

So if the Jews are thrown out of power in a Gentile nation, their response is to use their control of the mass media and political influence to push other nations around the world into a war against that nation (and its allies). The Jews pushed Britain and France into a war against Germany. The Jewish collaborator in America, Franklin Delano Roosevelt continually provoked the Japanese until they attacked Pearl Harbor, giving America a back door route into World War Two.

To cover up the insidious origins and scheming that went into causing World War Two, the Jews created the Holocaust story. The Holocaust effectively smears anyone critical of the Jews as a “potential mass murderer” by making the claim that the anti-Semites in Germany were mass murderers. The Holocaust story was invented largely after World War Two ended. It is intended as war propaganda to justify the war and to give the Jews a “Get out of Criticism Free” card that they have endlessly used since the war. The Holocaust story however is a gigantic fabrication. The world Jewish population did not significantly change from 1939 to 1945, remaining stable at about 15 million. Half a million Jews remained in Paris largely unmolested which makes no sense given the Jewish claims of extermination. Other facts refuting the Holocaust can be found here and here.

America is currently swirling around the bowl, looking at a possible Second Great Depression as our economy creaks and groans under the weight of 100 million Third World people. All attempts to close our borders to Third World immigration have been frustrated by Jewish control of our politicians. The Jews want a large non-White population in America. The Jews want to destroy the White race by encouraging race-mixing with these non-Whites because Jews fear that a pure White population might rebel against them.

Only the expulsion of the Jews will get America on the right track to save our nation. Once the Jews are gone, we will be free to expel the non-Whites. We will be able to create a currency that isn’t undermined by runaway inflation. We will no longer be running up our National Debt as we occupy Muslim nations and fight wars for the sake of Israel. White creatively, labor and productivity will all be richly rewarded. Jewish middlemen, lawyers and usurers will no longer plunder the wealth of the nation.

Jewish magazine 'Forward' Taken to Task

2008-05-24T01:53:00.000-07:00

W. Lindsay Wheeler said:

Yehezkel Dror writes that "When Survival of the Jewish People Is at Stake, There’s No Place for Morals". What about the German peoples' survival? Uh? Hypocrites? What is another name for Communism? Who is the creator of Communism? What is the end goal of communism? Another name for communism is Marxism and why is it called Marxism? Because Karl Marx created. What is another name for it? International Socialism. What is the end goal of International socialism? One World Government. In order to have International socialism, in order to have One World Government, the people have to be deracinated. Embedded in International Socialism, embedded in communism is a Deracination Ideology. International Socialism/Communism/Marxism also has another word---Jewish Bolshevism. Communism and this deracination ideology is Jewish ideology. What do you think Rosa Luxemberg wrote her "Nationalities Question" for? What is ONE of the purposes of the Spartacus/Communist league of Weimar Germany? To deracinate the German people in order to fit them for International Socialism's New World Government. Jewish Bolshevism is about deracinating the world. Political Correctness was coined in the 1920s Soviet Russia. This is the Jewish goal for the rest of us. Is Yehezkel Dror so ignorant of his own people's involvement and creation of communism and its deracinating effects? It is alright for the Jews to destroy other races but it isn't alright for the German people to defend themselves against Jewish Bolshevism?

Hypocrites. The Double Mind. Isn't what Yehezkel Dror commends is exactly the rational for the National Socialists? You attack European Culture all the time and you have spread your poison to the rest of Europe, you deny any European the right to defend his race but go to any length to preserve yours.

You are nothing but hypocrites of the highest order. Adolf Hitler and the German National Socialists already took Yehezkel Dror's opinions and practiced them. Who first threatened genocide? It was Jewish Bolshevism and its deracination ideology. I suggest you read Rosa Luxemberg's "Nationalities Question". You threaten all other people and when they defend themselves against your prededations---you call them "Nazis".

You people are sick.

http://www.forward.com/articles/13388/

Spic Crime free-for-all Nationwide

2008-04-14T21:58:00.000-07:00

But Let's look at Watsonville:

A 22-year-old Watsonville woman was arrested late Sunday as an accomplice in the attempted murder of her children's 21-year-old father. The father was flown to a San Francisco Bay area hospital after he was shot in the head during a high speed car chase on the outskirts of Watsonville, officials said Monday.
Natalie Gonzales was taken into custody in the Las Lomas area about a half hour after the 6:34 p.m. shooting, which led to a two-car crash at the intersection of Green Valley and Amesti roads, officials said.

The California Fish and Game warden stopped Gonzales while she was driving a black Escalade-style pickup, which was seen fleeing the scene of the crash, leaving in its wake two cars, a green BMW and a white GMC pickup, said Lt. Phil Wowak, a spokesman with the Santa Cruz County Sheriff/Coroner's Office.

Gonzales, believed to be a passenger in the Escalade at the time of the shooting, eventually took over driving. The alleged shooter, a Watsonville area man, fled from the vehicle shortly after the shooting and is now the subject of a police search, according to Wowak.

Shell casings from a semiautomatic, however, were found inside the Escalade at the time of Gonzales's arrest, giving investigators enough evidence to book Gonzales on charges of attempted murder and weapons violations, Wowak said.

Officials are not releasing the name or the description of the shooter -- other than to say that he's believed to be in his 20s.

The father, who'd been driving the BMW, had to undergo brain surgery early Monday morning, Wowak said.
"He's not doing so good," said Wowak of the man's condition.

According to Wowak, Gonzales told officers during the investigation that the couple has two children together, but Gonzales did not say what the motive behind the shooting was, and didn't reveal the shooter's whereabouts.

"She's being less than cooperative," said Wowak.

According to police reports, the shooting occurred while the BMW was chasing the Escalade northbound on Green Valley Road after some words were exchanged between the occupants of both vehicles.

A passenger in the BMW was shot in the leg and was treated at a local hospital.

The two passengers in the white GMC pickup, which had been traveling southbound on Green Valley Road, suffered minor injuries and were treated locally.

Wowak said that after the driver of the BMW was shot in the head, he lost control of the vehicle and nearly collided head on with the white pickup, which rolled over.

And the average White citizen is trapped in the middle of this. The statistics speak for themselves. We were far better off without them and their ridiculous gang culture.

Kevin MacDonald on Jewish Nation Murderers

2007-10-17T11:26:00.001-07:00

The Jewish segment of Christiane Amanpour's God's Warriors is doubtless the best and most refreshing comment about what's going on in Israel ever to appear on American television. The take-home message—the one that will be lurking around in the back of the minds of viewers long after watching it—is the image of fanatical Jews. There are repeated images of religious Jews referring to the West Bank and Jerusalem as promised to Jews in Genesis and advocating that Arabs either move or be expelled. There are Jewish activists bent on destroying the Al-Aqsa Mosque built at the site of the ancient Jewish temple and plotting to kill Palestinian schoolchildren; Jewish settlers being hauled out of the Sinai, Gaza, and various West Bank outposts by the Israeli army; Baruch Goldstein's massacre of praying Palestinians; masses of Jews expressing hatred toward Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin because of his endorsement of the Oslo peace process; the assassination of Rabin by Yigal Amir, a Jewish fanatic inspired by Goldstein; Ariel Sharon, "the Godfather of the Settlements," visiting the Al-Aqsa Mosque and fomenting the Second Intifada.

There is a particularly striking segment on Jewish woman from New York who moved to Israel because "I was never fully American. I was Jewish." As a child, she learned Hebrew before she learned English, and her summers were spent at Zionist youth camps. She now recruits financial support for the settlements from Christian Zionists in America. The Christian congregation sings songs in Hebrew, and the Israeli and American flags are juxtaposed..

In America we tend to think that Jews are "just like us. After all, Israel is the "only democracy in the Middle East" and a "staunch American ally." We have been led to think of Judaism as one of the three mainstream American religions. ("Have you heard the one where a priest, a minister, and a rabbi go into a bar? ...") When most Americans think of Jews, they think of the the friendly doctor who lives in the neighborhood, the brilliant scientist at the university, or the liberal social activist on behalf of the downtrodden.

But the Jews in God's Jewish Warriors often don't look like us at all. They are often religious Jews with long braided hair, beards, and names like Dvir and Dov. (New York State Assemblyman and West Bank settler Dov Hikind is depicted contributing some of his campaign funds to the settlements.) Many of the men use tefillin and wear yarmulkes, and they rock back and forth when they pray. The women often cover their hair and wear long gowns resembling a mild version of the Muslim purdah.

Judaism's Middle Eastern roots are on display, and there is nothing Western about it at all. These people don't seem very democratic, and they seem massively ethnocentric. They live in a completely Jewish world where their every thought and perception seem colored by their Jewish identity. Theirs is an apartheid world separated by high concrete walls from their Palestinian neighbors, where even tiny settlements are necessarily protected by the Israeli army. And at a time when Americans are constantly being encouraged by Jewish organizations like the ADL to be ever more tolerant of all kinds of diversity, these people are anything but tolerant. Calls for expropriation and expulsion of the Palestinians are commonplace among them. Israel has created a classic Middle Eastern segmentary society in which different groups live in an ingroup/outgroup world, completely isolated from each other. (Click here for a discussion of contrasts between Middle Eastern and Western societies.)

Not surprisingly, pro-Israel activist groups in the U.S. are not pleased. The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) calls it "CNN's Abomination." Depictions of influential Jews who are obviously "not like us" are likely to trigger feelings of estrangement and alienation in most Americans—a natural consequence of our evolved psychology. CAMERA's main complaint is that there is too much focus on extremists rather than on more typical Jews. But as Amanpour notes at the beginning, "in the last 40 years [God's Jewish warriors] have changed the history of the Middle East." The question is not how representative these Jews are of American Jews or even Israeli Jews. The question is how much influence they have had. As I have argued, the settlement movement is the vanguard of Judaism, and Jews who actively oppose this state of affairs are eventually marginalized. If Jewish history shows anything, it's that the radicals eventually come to dominate the Jewish community.

The result is a full-fledged campaign by Jewish organizations against CNN. In an article titled "CNN Comes Under Unprecedented Attack," the Forward reports that members of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations "have asked CNN to avoid rerunning the show before concerns about factual errors and bias are addressed and corrected. It is also requesting that the network invest similar resources to produce a new program that would "rectify the bias and inappropriate context.” “We are aware of some advertisers that have already distanced themselves from 'God’s Jewish Warriors,'" ... “It was recommended that all advertisers be contacted to express concern at their association with this offensive program." "

Amanpour does an excellent job showing how the organized Jewish community in America, and especially AIPAC, has rallied to the defense of the settlements in defiance of international law and every president since Jimmy Carter. Missing is a depiction of the internal politics of American Jews in which Jewish voices who oppose support for Jewish radicals are rendered powerless. But this is an incredibly brave and informed presentation of the radical vanguard of the Jewish community that is having such a huge impact on the Middle East and, via its effects on US foreign policy, the entire world.

Hey White man, Like being genocided by parasites posing as victims?

2007-08-29T10:06:00.000-07:00

My Struggle

By Eustace Mullins

My life will be judged worthwhile to the extent that it is of use to others. For this reason, I wish to tell of the things which have happened to me in my struggle against the forces of darkness. It is my hope that others will be forewarned of what to expect in this fight. During the past thirty years of this struggle, many of the great patriots who gave me, instinctively, their valuable guidance and inspiration, were themselves, heavily immobilized by the machinations of the international Jewish power. Yet, they always continued their work as much as possible. To the end of their lives, they never swerved from the responsibility which had been laid on them by their knowledge of the truth. Each of the patriots who guided me, among them, Ezra Pound, Col. Eugene Sanctuary, George Sylvester Viereck and Mrs. Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, had been born with natural gifts. Throughout their lives, they used these gifts for the benefit of others. Very few Americans know of the persecution which these patriots endured throughout their lives. Yet, during the years I knew them and worked with them, this persecution was mentioned, if at all, only in passing and without regret. They considered their personal losses unimportant compared to the sufferings of the Gentile people who have been enslaved by the Jews. Similarly, it might seem idle carping for me to mention the murder of my parents by government agents as stroked of the Jews revenge against me for my work, when we consider that sixty-six million Christians have been killed in Russian concentration camps since 1917, murdered by the Jewish Communists who built and operated these camps. These millions lie nameless and unmourned. But they were no less and no more, the victims of the Jews than my parents and many other Americans whose sacrifices have gone unrecorded and unheeded by those who are next on the lists. No one who has been martyred by the Jews should remain unknown. And no one who has been martyred by the Jews will remain unavenged.

I became the object of the Jews hatred by events which moved in a straight line. Successively, I became the protégé of George Stimpson, the most respected journalist in Washington, who founded the National Press, Ezra Pound, the world most famous poet, and H. L. Hunt, the worlds richest man. Of the three, only Ezra Pound fought the Jews openly. And he suffered grievously, spending thirteen years in a hideous urine soaked madhouse in Washington D.C. George Stimpson passed on to me many of the secrets of Washington, including the fact that Felix Frankfurter founded the Harold Ware Cell of Communists and the nature of the Jewish control over J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI. H.L. Hunt fought valiantly to preserve the values of Christian civilization. But was unable to deploy his money effectively in a battle which was outside of his experience.

I visited Ezra Pound in the cell in which he was held as a political prisoner and which he aptly termed ‘the hellhole.’ I met George Sylvester Viereck in New York after he had served six years and lost his health, in a Federal Penitentiary. He had been falsely convicted of not registering properly as a foreign agent. In fact, his attorney had filled out all the required forms, and the case was thrown out of court on two occasions. However, Franklin D. Roosevelt had sworn to get Viereck, and he had the Department of Justice indict him a third time. A newly selected judge refused to allow testimony which would have acquitted Vierect. During the trial, his son, George Sylvester Viereck II, was killed in the U.S. Army landing at Anzio, a disastrous slaughter of American youths presided over by our famed Jew loving General Mark Clark. Roosevelt ordered the Army to withhold announcement of the boy’s death, fearing that it would bring about sympathy for Viereck. As a result, while the trial dragged on, his wife’s letters to their son were returned marked ‘Deceased.’ Frantic with worry, his wife tried to find out what had happened. She suffered a complete nervous breakdown when the boy’s death was finally announced, after many weeks of denial by Army officials. Viereck showed me a letter from Roosevelt, written in 1938, on White House stationery, asking of the German government, Viereck was then the most influential German-American in the United States. He replied to Roosevelt that he could not do this. And Roosevelt vowed to put him in prison. Which he did, hiring an ADL agent to swear that Viereck had offered him money to blow up a bridge. To anyone who knew the mild mannered, professional writer, the testimony was preposterous. Yet, Viereck went to prison for the duration of the war. When I knew him, he was living in a small room, penniless, and supported by the generosity of a nephew.

In 1942, when I joined the United States Army Air Force, I had no thought that thirty-six years later, I would still be engaged in a life-or-death struggle with a tenacious and relentless enemy. I regarded World War II as an unavoidable hiatus in my chosen career as an artist and writer. The war would be over in a couple of years, and I would resume the writing of books which I had already begun. I had no personal desire to ‘slap the Jap,’ or ‘stun the Hun,’ or any of the ‘Tin Pan Alley’ slogans which the Jews had conjured up to herd the Gentile cattle to the slaughter. Like many of my fellow soldiers, I sensed that the enemy was not really overseas, but was more likely entrenched here on the home front. But also like my fellow soldiers, I knew there was little I could do about it. Almost a year later, I read some material which gave me enlightenment.

Although it seems unbelievable now, during the height of World War II, there was more widespread dissemination of patriotic material on the Jewish conspiracy than there is today. Many dedicated patriots turned out small papers which printed the hard facts. They had long since learned how to survive the daily harassment by FBI agents, ADL agents, and hordes of other ‘home front’ guardians. They were frequently denounced by the paid press. And after reading one of these hysterical attacks, I sent Gerald L. K. Smith twenty-five dollars for some material. This was a large sum at that time, as my pay was only fifty dollars a month.

By return mail, I received a large box containing several hundred copies of ‘The Cross and the Flag.’ The first writing I had ever encountered on the Jewish problem. It contained many revelations. I realized at once that this was not the type of material to be quoted in the usual barracks discussions. Several soldiers had commented that there were informers in the barracks. Although I did not then make the connection, there was to be found in almost every barracks, a particularly obnoxious Jew, usually with a Brooklyn accent. It never occurred to me that these Jews were being as obnoxious as possible in order to goad the other soldiers into making an anti-Semitic remark. Nor did it occur to me that these Brooklyn Jews often had college degrees. At that time, everyone with college background was ordered to try out for the Officer Candidate School. I did not realize that these Brooklyn Jews remained with the enlisted men for surreptitious reasons. This type of political supervision of the troops is axiomatic in Communist strategy. It was meticulously observed in the American Armed Forces during World War II. In combat zones, officers and enlisted men who had previously voiced doubts about the wisdom of Roosevelt’s crusade to save Communism, were shot in the back by these same intelligence agents who had followed them into the front lines. While General Eisenhower was cosily tucked away with his British Secret Service ‘Chauffeur’, Kay Summersby, the real decisions were made by his Liaison Officer, Captain Warburg of the Kuhn, Loeb Banking house. In the Soviet Zone, the elimination of those soldiers who were not convinced Communism was so basic a part of their war operations that even during the darkest days of the war, Stalin still refused to slacken one iota the absolute direction of front line strategy by hard-line commissars. Realizing this, Hitler ordered his troops to execute on the spot any commissar captured in the war zone, in order to paralyze the Soviet operations.

The Communist control over the United States Army surfaced during World War II with the selection of General George C. Marshall as Chief of Staff. As Senator Joseph McCarthy later pointed out, Marshall was under Communist Party discipline at all times. This did not interfere with his direction of our war effort, since the goals of the Washington Marxists were the same, the total defeat of the German anti-Communist forces. In the Korean and Vietnam wars, Communists direction of our Armed Forces remained unchanged, even though we were then fighting against ‘Communist’ forces. When General Douglas McArthur tried to oppose this Communist betrayal of our men, he was fired by David Niles, the Jewish Communist who was President Truman’s ‘Aide.’

The Communist recognized that final political control always resided in the military. In Moscow and in Washington, every officer is absolutely responsive to the current ideological line, regardless of any military consideration. This was recently demonstrated when every officer on active duty was ordered to support the giveaway of the Panama Canal, while many retired officers openly opposed it. The most stringent measures are carried out to ensure that no officer is able to form a group to discuss and possibly take action against the high treason of his superiors. When Commander George Lincoln Rockwell surfaced at the Pentagon, there was consternation throughout the high command. At the least sign of any independence or patriotic speech from any officer, the Jewish controlled media immediately raises a hue and cry about ‘Fascism’ and the offender is quickly neutralized.

After receiving the supply of Smith’s magazine, I distributed them in the day rooms to see who would read them. The next day, I toured the day rooms to see if anyone was reading them, and perhaps, to strike up a conversation. Every issue had disappeared. Not once did I see a copy while I remained on the base. Apparently, I had been followed, and the papers picked up as fast as I had left them. During my remaining years of military service, I encountered no one with strong political views. My own opinions were those of any young man of the period, hardly committed to any strong ideology. After the war, I enrolled at Washington and Lee University, intending to study law. After two years, I decided I should go to art school, and enrolled at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in Washington, D.C. The school had the usual mongrel types in its student body and a number of ardent Communists on the staff. But it attracted many of the leading writers as speakers. Like others among the ten million veterans, my main concern was in getting on with my career, and I had little concern with politics.

Over night my lack of concern changed. One of the teachers at the Institute had been visiting Ezra Pound. He suggested I accompany him one afternoon, an offer which rather disturbed me. I thought it unlikely that the man who had edited T. S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway would be interested in talking to me. But I went along. The moment I entered the gloom of the insane ward, my former complaisance vanished, never to return. I suddenly realized that a great writer had been punished by being confined in a madhouse, solely for his political views. In an instant, Pound filled the ideological gap in my life. Never again would I remain silent in the face of injustice.

Pound apparently considered me a kindred spirit, and offered to give me ‘my own day.’ That is, an afternoon to visit him alone each week. I accepted. And by the time the next week rolled around, he was waiting for me with food, assignments for research, and errands to run. Shortly afterwards, he brought up the Federal Reserve System, which I had never heard of. From that day, my work was cut out for me. His concern for his country had been aptly expressed by Charles Dickens in his American Notes, written a century earlier:

“I do fear that the heaviest blow ever dealt at liberty, will be dealt by this country, in the failure of its example to the earth.”

The loss of liberty in America, which is occurring before our eyes, means the autocracy will be enthroned throughout the world, and that the freedom which was ours at our birth will never be known by future generations. Olga Ivinskaya, a Russian writer, writes of her years in a Soviet prison camp:

“Sanagian (a fellow inmate) had put down the story of her life in her awkward, uneven handwriting. She came from a working class family and her father—long since dead—had taken part in the Revolution in 1917, for this she heaped curses on his memory.”

In the usual hogwash about aristocrats, we never stop to think that it was the working people of Russia, not aristocrats, who were enslaved by the Communist Revolution. Similarly, in this country, it is the Jewish intellectuals, bankers, and industrialists who are in the forefront of the battle to enslave all Americans and take away their freedom forever. Should we allow this, future generations in the concentration camps will begin their days not with prayers, but with curses on our memory.

I soon began to visit Ezra Pound every day, a routine which I kept up for three years. During this time, I was thoroughly grounded in every aspect of the International Communist conspiracy. Pound said to me:

“I am telling you things I didn’t know until I was fifty. You are twenty-five, which means you are getting an extra twenty-five years to do something about it.”

When I went to New York, bankers on Wall Street told me:– “I was here during the crash, but I didn’t know what was going on until I read your book.” I explained that I had had the benefit of Pound’s experience, and his access to much information in Europe which had already been banned in the United States.

To support myself while writing the history of the Federal Reserve System, I obtained a job at the Library of Congress as a stack attendant. This was the same job J. Edgar Hoover had held for several years while he completed his law studies at George Washington University night school. A few weeks later, because I had done advanced photographic studies at the Institute, I was promoted to the Photography Department. In the next several months, I received two more promotions, as I had studied with one of the finest Japanese photographers. During these months, I was able to see Pound only on weekends, and he suggested I send some of my writings to ‘The Social Creditor,’ a small weekly published in England. I sent them some articles, which they printed, sending me enthusiastic comments. On day, while going into the National Press Club for my daily luncheon with George Stimpson, a man was handing out copies of ‘Common Sense’ at the front door. I showed it to Pound, an issue containing the Hermann Goering Testament. He suggested I send them articles, and they printed some excerpts from the Federal Reserve research.

One afternoon, a Jew came to the Library of Congress, asking for me. I was called out of the darkroom to see a Jew who was a caricature out of ‘Der Sturmer.’ He immediately began to cross question me, saying he had been sent from ‘Common Sense,’ and he asked, ‘Who is giving you your material? Where is this information coming from?’ Now wishing to involve Pound, who always faced the possibility of having his daily visitors turned away and being held incommunicado, I explained that I was doing research at the Library of Congress. It was obvious that he didn’t believe me. A gawky small town boy could hardly be privy to the machinations of the worlds most powerful and secretive bankers.

A team of FBI agents was now sent to the Library of Congress to question everyone who had worked with me. Senator Herbert Lehman, of the Lehman Brothers Banking house, and National Chairman of the Anti-Defamation League, had sent a demand to Luther Evans, Librarian of Congress, that I be fired because of an article I had written for the Social Creditor. The demand, written on ADL stationery, had been drawn up by the ADL operator, Edelstein, and signed by Lehman without reading it, as he accepted anything which Edelstein brought to him. The article exposed the fact that one Katz, Marshall Plan Administrator, presided over the most of the Marshall Plan material to Communist countries, instead of sending it to the non-Communist countries for which Congress had designated it. To honor Marshall for his service to the Communist countries and their cause, the plan to continue aid to the Communist countries surreptitiously had been drawn up and named for him. At the end of World War II, Lend Lease Aid to Russia and other Communist countries ended. Dean Acheson, Secretary of State, an unregistered agent for nine Communist countries through his law firm of Covington, Burling, and Acheson, (one of whose partners was Donald Hiss, brother to Alger Hiss) had tried to force a four billion loan to the new Communist regime of Poland. When Patriots in Congress turned this down, the Marshall Plan was formulated. Ostensibly earmarked for Greece, Italy, and other non-Communist countries, most of the Marshall Plan material was either distributed directly to Communist organizers in those countries, who used the aid as the basis for building up the Communist Party, or trans-shipped directly through those countries to Yugoslavia, and on to Poland and Russia. It was Tito’s attempt to keep much of this material, particularly heavy trucks, which caused the break between him and Stalin. However, neither of them dared to publicly argue the point, as it would have exposed the fact that Marshall Plan Aid was going to the Communists.

Although I as yet knew nothing of the ADL order that I be fired, I had had a previous contact with Senator Lehman. Pound had noticed an advertisement in the Washington Post that Lehman would be speaking at Howard University on behalf of ‘home rule,’ a plan to wrest control of the District of Columbia from a group of White businessmen and turn it over to the Negroes. Howard University was the Communist training school for Ralph Bunche and many other Negro Marxists. Through the dogged influence of Eleanor Roosevelt, it was the only college in the United States whose entire budget was provided by the Federal Government. Pound mentioned that Lehman, a typical Jewish degenerate, had a nervous tic, and suggested it would be amusing to see it in action.

When Dave Horton and I arrived at the Howard University auditorium, we found a group of Negroes, eight or ten, the entire audience for the August Senator. Rather put out by the poor attendance, Lehman, a short squat ole clothes dealer type, made a short speech about home rule and opened the floor to questions. Immediately, Horton and I were on our feet. “Would Lehman Brothers consider the District of Columbia a safe investment?”—asked Horton. “Will you support Alger Hiss as the first mayor of Washington?”—I asked. Lehman, a rather stupid Jew, was completely bewildered by our questions. We continued to fire questions at him, as his aides, two young city College Jews, shook their fists at us. The famed Lehman tic now made its appearance. It was not merely a tic of the eye, the entire left side of his face was twitching steadily and violently. The audience of Negroes was glaring at us, muttering, ‘Shame,’ as Lehman’s aides rushed him away.

I LATER LEARNED THAT IN THE FOYER OF THE LEHMAN MANSION IN NEW YORK, A SPLENDID FOURTEENTH CENTURY STATUE OF THE VIRGIN MARY, LOOTED FROM ONE OF THE GREAT CATHEDRALS OF EUROPE, STOOD NEAR THE DOOR. FOR THE TITILLATION OF VISITORS, A CIGARETTE WAS PLACED DANGLING FROM HER MOUTH.

A few days after our Howard University evening, I was handed a letter of dismissal from the Library of Congress. The FBI interrogations had turned up nothing which could be used against me, and had caused considerable angry comment among the employees. The letter stated I was being dismissed because I had written an article for the Social Creditor. I was given the option of making a personal appeal to the Librarian, which I did. In Evans office, he asked me, ‘Did you write this article?’

‘Yes,’ I replied. ‘Can you show me one false statement in it?’

‘I’m not competent to do that.’ said Evans. ‘This is not out of my hands. Your dismissal stands.’

‘But I am not a member of any political group.’ I protested. ‘I’ve never voted in my life. You have many staff members who are activist members of militant racial organizations. You have two staff members who do nothing but go through the stacks writing numbers bets all day. Why am I being singled out?’

Evans, who never once looked at me in the eye, jerked open the bottom drawer of his desk, where I glimpsed a half empty bottle of Country Gentleman bourbon. He looked longingly at it, turned to me, and said, ‘Well, that’s all.’

I later learned from a fellow employee at API, that the actual mechanism of my dismissal was handled through Jacob Blaustein, president of the American Oil Company, and a member of the board of API. Also, serving as president of the American Jewish Committee, whose agent ‘Charles Smith’ ran the day to day operations at Common Cause. He had only to say ‘Fire him,’ and it was done. For some months, Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, publisher of ‘Women’s Voice,’ had been featuring my articles, among them ‘Close the Public Schools’ and ‘Satan vs. Christ.’ The publisher obliterated my name as author on the ‘Satan vs. Christ’ article, and distributed many thousands of reprints through Common Sense. Some of his subscribers had learned of my plight, even tho he refused to tell them about it, and not knowing where to get in touch with me, had sent him checks made out to me. Not one of these was ever forwarded to me. I hitchhiked to Chicago, and got a job writing for a hotel trad paper ‘Institutions Magazine.’ This turned out to be the only job I ever held from which the FBI did not have me fired. After a few months there, I was offered a much better paying job with the Chicago Motor Club, the ‘Middle Western Affiliate’ of the American Automobile Association, and I resigned from ‘Institutions.’ Some years later, forgetting about the Institutions position, I told an audience at my alma mater, Washington and Lee University, that the FBI had fired me from every job I had ever held.

At the Chicago Motor Club, I became editor of Motor News, with a circulation of 250,000. During the next two years, I willingly took on additional duties as editor of the ‘Industrial Editors News Service,’ public relations counselor, and special events organizer. I had been at the club two years and one week with a drawer full of memoranda from my superior, James E. Bulger, praising my work, and thanking me for my new programs, when one sultry August afternoon, two well dressed men strode by Bulger’s secretary, and went into his office and closed the door. His secretary who was a close friend, turned to me and said, ‘I wonder what that’s all about?—– ‘I never saw them before.’ I replied.

The men stayed with Bulger for about an hour, and I could hear them arguing with him, but their voices were kept low. Finally, he buzzed for his secretary. She went in, and came back out immediately, and handed me a folded note. I opened it and read, ‘You are allowed five minutes to get your things and get out of the office.’—– ‘What’s going on?’—she asked me. I saw the tears were streaming down her fact. I showed her the note. ‘I know what’s in it,’ she said, ‘but what’s going on? Mr. Bulger is sick, we’ve got to help him—those men–.’ She turned and ran to the restroom.

I put some personal memoranda into an envelope and left the office. That evening, Bulger’s secretary called me at home. She told me that the two men were FBI agents and that when they demanded I be fired, Bulger flatly refused. This was understandable as I was doing the work of four people. They then threatened him for nearly an hour. He had had five heart attacks in the past several years, and he began to writhe with pain. He begged them to let him call his doctor. ‘Certainly,’ said one of the, ‘as soon as you fire Mullins.’ He then wrote the note. After I left the office, the FBI agents accompanied Bulger to the doctor, and then took him to his home, after warning him not to tell me or to give me my job back.

Being fired from the Chicago Motor Club was the greatest shock of my life. Certainly this was the goal of the FBI harassment. At the age of thirty-five, I had been one of the most active public relations counselors in Chicago, lunching at the best restaurants with the city’s leading executives. Now I was on the street with no prospects. Even so, I supposed that with my contacts, I would be able to get another public relations job. In the next few weeks, I was surprised that after each interview, I heard nothing more about a job. Friends at the Motor Club then told me that because of pressure from the Club’s Jewish members, Bulger was telling everyone who inquired about references that I was a notorious criminal who was wanted in several states. He never put this into writing, giving out the slander on the phone, after instructions from the Jew who was the Club’s legal counsel. Since I was fired from the Chicago Motor Club in August, 1958, I have never again been able to get a professional job.

After several weeks, I realized it as unlikely that I would get any work in Chicago. I began work on a book about Friedrich Nietzsche, and while doing research at the Newberry Library, I found a great deal of material on Ezra Pound’s career. I wrote him suggesting that I do his biography. He immediately replied that he had been waiting for me to do this, and that I was to be his only authorized biographer. I then asked Henry Regnery if he could give me an advance on this book. He replied that he could not (he owned the largest window shade factory in the world, a bank, and other holdings, worth eighty million dollars.) But he suggested that H. L. Hunt needed someone to edit a book. I called Hunt and he agreed to pay me a hundred dollars a week. I said that I couldn’t live on that, in fact, I was living on thirty-five dollars a week—–and he said that I could live in his home. At that time, Hunt’s income was ten million dollars a week, and he had accumulated a fortune of three billion dollars.

I arrived at Hunt’s home in Dallas with one battered suitcase and an old Plymouth, purchased a year before for one hundred dollars, with the entire front end smashed in. We immediately established complete rapport, as he had lived for years out of a suitcase, traveling in the back-country picking up the oil leases which were the basis of his fortune. I resided in their guest room, which had always bee occupied by Senator Joseph McCarthy when he came to Dallas, and Hunt and I settled down to work on the book ‘Alpaca.’ After several months of intensive work, it was completed, and I became restless. By this time, Hunt has installed me in an office next to his own, and whenever someone called him, he would say, ‘Why don’t you check with Mullins on that?’ I realized he was only using me for a buffer, but it was a flattering situation for a penniless writer to be referred to as the confidential assistant of the world’s richest man. However, I remained a penniless writer, and he remained the world’s richest man. I began to realize I should be getting back to work on the Pound biography, and one afternoon, I told him I had to return to Chicago. He was completely surprised, and I saw that he was hurt and disappointed by my decision. Nevertheless, I have always thought of him with affection and admiration, and he seemed well disposed toward me on later occasions when I talked to him in Dallas and in New York.

Although I knew nothing of it at the time, my association with H. L. Hunt had driven the Jews into a furious campaign of ‘harassment’ against my parents. The conspirators were terrified that he might finance my publications or a political organization, although at the time, I had nothing to which he might donate money. I knew that my father had had a serious coronary attack in 1956, but I was not told until years later that the attack had been brought on by a series of vicious interrogations by Army Counter Intelligence Corps agents. My mother later told me they were determined to make him reveal the names of persons financially supporting my travels and writings. Since no one had ever given me a cent, there was nothing he could tell them, but they refused to believe him. Knowing he had Wednesday afternoons off from the store in which he worked, two agents waited for him in his car. They forced him into the car, drove him to the top of a nearby mountain, and interrogated him for several hours, telling him they were going to throw him off the mountain. At one point, he tried to escape from the car. They knocked him unconscious, drove him back to the store, and left him in the parked car. He finally came to, and drove home. The next day, he had a severe coronary attack, from which he never completely recovered.

My parents did not dare tell me these details, out of a desire to protect me, as they knew I would kill someone for these atrocities. Nevertheless, I knew they had been interrogated and I wrote to the Secretary of Defense. I received an answer, admitting that he had been interrogated, and giving the names of the two men who had interrogated him. Some weeks later, I tried to contact these men in Washington. I was told they had been sent on a mission to Guam, and that the plane had crashed with all aboard being killed. The letter with the men’s names has since disappeared from my files.

While I was with H. L. Hunt in Dallas, the FBI began to visit my parents. Their telephone was tapped, and they received harassing telephone calls during the night. The harassment and brutality of this campaign was intended solely to provoke me into some drastic action. I come from mountain people, and we never forget an injury, even if it takes fifty years to wreak our revenge. My temper remained under control only because my parents refused to let me know what was happening to them, and the ADL-FBI provocation failed. Their campaign was intensified, and one evening in 1961, my father, whose heart conditions had steadily gotten worse during this harassment, received a telephone call from a known FBI provocateur, ‘We’ve just sent out a national alert to pick ‘him’ up.’

My father dropped the phone, ‘they finally got Clarence’ he said, as he collapsed. He was taken to the hospital where he died of massive heart failure. More than three years went by before my mother told me what had happened. Of course, there had never been an alert, as I have never been arrested by anyone.

In ‘My Life in Christ,’ I openly accused Lyndon Johnson, who was then President, of murdering my father, although he had only been acting for Herbert Lehman, who then supported his Presidential ambitions. The only response was that during Johnson’s Presidency, every copy of this book that I mailed out—-was destroyed by the Post Office,—until I began insuring each copy.

(continued next issue)

My Struggle, published in Christian Vanguard, June, July and August 1978

Real Men Fight The Jews

2007-08-28T17:35:00.001-07:00

By Patrick Grimm

It’s time to clear up a few misunderstandings with the Jewish fiends who only come around to threaten and debase this space. These little totalitarians wish to shut down anyone who has anything less than praise for their easily confirmed criminal enterprises. Sorry, but that is not going to happen for you, and even if it did, my work and my words are not going anywhere. Like a penny, good, bad or neutral, they will always turn up somewhere.

But let me be frank. If you wish to accost me with name-calling, at least be more politely formal about it. Don’t call me an “anti-Semite”, a word that to you only means anyone who doesn’t appreciate what you are doing to wreck our foundations and who exposes your little fibs about Israel, the Jewish religion and the entire shoddily constructed anti-intellectual framework of the Holohaux you moan about like incessant babies. No, Jewish provocateurs, I will not genuflect before you, will not bend the knee when I hear the word “Jews” in hushed tones that I would liken to a monastery dedicated to the religion of Taken-With-Thyself-ness. As Edgar Steele famously said “THAT’S MR. ANTI-SEMITE TO YOU!” and I would second his sentiments.

The truth of the matter is though, “anti-Semite” is not really the proper terminology for me. For the fact remains, most Jews are not “Semites” and many non-Jews are. A lot of the Palestinians are “Semitic” but you have no qualms about indiscriminately slaughtering them, gunning down their children in cold blood and desecrating their graves, and then having your apparatchiks in the US help procure alms to pay for the whole atrocity that you call a country while thousands of Gentiles die for your proxyish little adventures in the desert sand, which I’m sure gets quite a chuckle of anti-Gentile disdain in the Knesset. You are almost flummoxed that the Goyim could be so stupid and short-sighted on your account, and I couldn’t agree with you more.

No, you little Jewish totalitarians--the ones who bitch and infantilely demand that this blog be stricken from the internet because it refuses to worship you--I am not “anti-Semitic” at all. The best way to describe me would be to call me “anti-Jewish”, a phrase far more narrow and exacting and accurate, as well as provocative and gosh, just plain fun too because it gets you fuming and swearing in Yiddish! I don’t have a big personal problem with “Semites” but I do have a huge personal problem with all of the Jews--some of them even blue-eyed and blonde, or red-headed and green-eyed--who are jack hammering away at our foundations. Perhaps some tepid folks are afraid to say it, but America has a Jewish, an organized Jewish problem of almost incalculable proportions. And I am fully aware that some in this movement would think it unseemly, perhaps even obscenely unseemly, to talk this way.

Oh, some will cry “All Jews are not part of the Jewish supremacism/Jewish extremist/Jewish criminality/Jewish enter your complaint here problem! It’s just their ‘evil Jewish leadership’!” But this argument is tired. If all Jews do not give moral or financial support to what the most visible and the most irascibly censorious and sinister among the Jewish powerbrokers are doing, let them step forward and say so. Let them “come out from among them and be separate” so as not to be victimized by the worldwide Gentile backlash which inevitably will come (it always has) if this behavior is not curtailed. Let even a small organization of righteous Jews stand up and decry, not just the crimes of Israel, for this is no longer sufficient, but the crimes and dirty-dealing of the entire Jewish establishment which is even now itching to collapse Western Civilization and has already stolen free speech guarantees from most of Europe.

Are there ANY JEWS who will speak out against these things? Will ANY JEWS lend their influence, their finances and their acumen to the cause of freedom and justice? Will ANY JEWS ANYWHERE do more than just wag their fingers at the Zionist anti-humanitarian pockmark for its state terrorism, and instead lend their tongues to wag against the Jewish open borders agenda, the Jewish hard-core and child pornography agenda, the Jewish anti-white agenda, the mostly Jewish globalist agenda, the disproportionate Jewish white sex slave agenda, the Jewish ADL, JDL, AJC, ACLU agenda, the Jewish anti-gun and anti-Second Amendment agenda, the overwhelmingly Jewish drug trafficking agenda coming out of Israel, the Jewish organized crime agenda, the Jewish media black-out of black crime agenda, the Jewish Hollywood slandering of Christianity agenda, the Jewish religious Orthodox hatred of Gentiles agenda and all the rest? Will ANY JEWS unequivocally and without excuses, subterfuge and double-talk CONDEMN ALL OF THESE JEWISH AGENDAS?

I’m sorry, but my “Benefit of the Doubt” is broken. So I will do exactly what John “Birdman” Bryant tried on his famous website. I will ask any Jews who are reading my words and who agree that what Big Jewry and all its financial backers are doing is wrong, to condemn all of these dastardly deeds right here on this blogspot. There should be no excuses, no “well the Gentiles let us do it” which to our eternal discredit is true, but is not a good enough excuse to wipe away the sins of the Jewish community.

Day by day, the silence is deafening from the Jews in America. More and more of our citizens are slowly beginning to believe (and not without good reason) that Jewish influence and Jewish power have only brought us disaster. I may be incorrect, but the time may come when silence = complicity. If there are good Jews waiting, perhaps frightened and even horrified by the hideous strength accrued and easily utilized by their scruple-free brethren, let them identify themselves, separate themselves and exonerate themselves from the hatred that is being piled up against them by the activities of the Jews running the show at the top, those Jews who couldn’t buy a conscience, even if someone offered one to them wholesale. This is the only good faith gesture that many Gentiles would require of Jews, just to ease our minds. And so I extend the olive branch to you now.

But until I can look out upon the parched landscape of American politics and spy at least more Jews than I can count on one hand standing against Big Jewry, I will label myself, not “anti-Semitic”, but anti-Jewish. And no Jewish scientific discoveries, brainy inventions and Nobel Peace prize lists, all of them quoted and brandished like absolvents, will make a dime’s worth of difference to me or to anyone else who is aware of the facts.

White American Native: Weep for what we have lost

2007-07-08T21:48:00.000-07:00

From hearth--stone.blogspot.com

Do you remember what America used to be like? I do:

Men had not yet been emasculated through government school and media sensitivity training. A young family started off able to buy a home because the government didn’t extort half of a man’s income (the only thing they paid the Fed was in postage stamps) and the family wasn’t competing with waves of illegal immigrants who pack two to five families into a two-bedroom house.

Mothers didn’t work outside the home in those days—they were mothers. Mommy was always there to fix scraped knees and hot meals. Parents felt safe to let their children play outside (men took the responsibility of keeping their neighborhoods safe). Communities were close in those days. Everybody knew each other and attended church together. Grandma and Grandpa lived in the back house and the Cousins lived around the corner.

Folks tended their gardens in the morning, worked at their trades through the day, read the bible at supper and sat on the porch talking of all of it into the evening. The family always prayed together at bedtime. Saturday morning was for hunting or fishing and Saturday evening was for entertaining friends and family; women busied themselves with the preparation of food (in which they took much pride) and men folk talked (between gulps of bourbon and puffs of the pipe) of theology, history and the neighborhood. Sunday was a day of rest which always started with church. Sunday evenings were usually a family affair.

People left their doors unlocked and it was safe to walk down the narrow streets. It was a different world. It was a better world.

Though I’ve only witnessed America as it was in the smallest glimpses, my Grandfather grew up in that world and greatly mourned its passing. By the time he died he was a relic of a bygone age and he knew it. America had become something foreign and wholly unrecognizable to him. He told me many times how no one in his day would have believed it if you’d told them of what was to come. He said, “They’d ‘a thought you were a sandwich short ‘a picnic.” They simply could not have imagined that America would purposely discard her past, breaking with all things of constancy— religion, land, history and heritage. The idea of our own government taking part in the purposeful eradication of our White Christian people seemed too much like fictional ranting of the pulp and dime novel writers.

The nature of this societal dismantling is so holistic that even those in the church are largely blind to the fact that they’ve traded in nearly all their civics and social theory of their forbearers for a new social orthodoxy. All the old heroes of American history are now considered the villains. History is now itself regarded as racist and religiously bigoted not just because it was written by White Christians but also because most of it is about White Christian nations and peoples, as they were not only the writers but also the primary players in most of recorded history. But to say that is also racist. So world history is now being strained and filtered through the multicultural paradigm of the new age—any reassertion of the old Christian view of history is hypocritically labeled “Revisionism”.

The truth is officially banned. The tolerance-cult will not tolerate truth and virtue as defined by God. Those who utter such sentiments are heretics before the new humanist prelates. As such, they oft suffer the heretic’s fate—ostracism, disenfranchisement, imprisonment and in some instances…death.

The peoples with whom we are being systemically replaced have no love of our heroes and history. They don’t visit the historic sites of America, save for those that relate to the ‘civil rights’ [sic] movement. They don’t watch documentaries about the great American colonies unless the focus is on the fictions of Aboriginal genocide and the slave trade—wholly for the purposes of vilification. They don’t open books about high medieval architecture under any circumstances. They see the manifold blessings wrought by God through ruddy hands to be nothing but a memorial to the collective evils of Paternalism, Chauvinism and Racism. These they understand to be the warp and woof of Christendom. They call good evil and evil good.

Even in the church, other peoples don’t bother themselves, as Whites do, with any theological nuance. Their expression of the Christian religion appears in its highest form as nearly indistinguishable from a séance or a congregation of demoniacs. They rarely, if ever, attain to any semblance of orthodoxy (possible exception noted for certain Asian groups). Even the most theologically conservative Blacks consider the jugernaughts of the faith such as Luther, Calvin and the Puritans to have been monsters. They unabashedly proclaim the Communist machinations of the civil rights movement to be the zenith of Christian history. Theirs’ is not a difference of politics, but an inversion of Christian Cosmology en toto.

Though they may not all hate Anglos and Anglo-Christian culture, they are in the best cases, indifferent to such things because they have their own cultures and their own heroes. The best of them really couldn’t care less about our cultural heritage. America is not, in their opinion, a place to be preserved; rather, it is to be remade into something that it never before resembled. To the sea of invaders who now overtake us America is good so long as it is nothing like it was intended by its founders to be—a White Christian Libertarian society. America is good so long as it isn’t allowed to be American. Similarly, Europe is good so long as it is never again European.

The systematic dissociation from White American history is so comprehensive that the average high school social studies text allocates a chapter to Martin Luther King Jr. but affords George Washington no more than a paragraph (in which he is denounced as a racist)! And we are even told that the standard American history texts are now being written by Mexican professors inorder to impart a more “culturally sensitive” view of the American conquest of the Southwest. That translates to blatant assertion that Whites “stole” Mexican land and now consequently owe all the fruit of our people’s toil to the displaced Aborigines. Other schools have simply eliminated history as a subject altogether.

The erasure of our civilization is also seen in the academic black-listing and expungement of all literature written by Whites. They’ve replaced the high prose of Shakespeare with the yarns of urban jive “poets”. Melville, Wordsworth, Hawthorne, Kipling—all replaced by the diaries of Che Guevara, Anne Frank and various Negro dissidents.

Hispanics, Blacks, Jews and Muslims are individually and collectively promoted to be the cultural, social, ethical, sexual and racial superiors to European Man. They regularly speak of “killing all Whites” and are applauded by secular priests for such “acts of courage”. And though we Whites still pay all the taxes, uphold the remaining vestiges of law and order, and fund all the charities, we are universally forbade from expressing any racial, cultural or religious solidarity with other Whites or even with European American heritage in general. Mass cries for White genocide are considered ‘courageous’ but Whites who dare to raise objection to their own liquidation are ‘filthy Bigots’.

As we now recede from history, we may soon pass from all memory— a people unlamented. When we pass into the night no one will care about all those things that our people found so important because those things are now and ever have been far from the thoughts and affections of those who now eclipse us in number. We were a hated majority despite our unique benevolence toward ‘the other’ but we’ve since become the despised minority as ‘the others’ surge in population. This trend has been exponential and will likely continue until the one remaining White Christian Male breathes his last.

I yet hope against hope but the Demographers are unanimous on the issue—European Man, as a race, will be extinguished in the next two centuries. Nothing short of a miracle will reverse the current path on which the White Man has embarked. Western Civilization hangs by a thread—Europe, the people of Japheth—they carry with them the seed and the seedbed of Christendom. The Orthodox Christian Faith is a uniquely European phenomenon and absent that blessed heritage it seems that the world will slide precipitously toward the base proclivities of the stygian jungle. God forbid.

May He preserve in our posterity a remnant for His namesake.

In The Name of All things Sacred. Make the treason STOP.

2007-07-07T18:18:00.001-07:00

Immigrants become citizens
Posted: Friday, Jul 6th, 2007
BY: ROGER SIDEMAN [suspected kike]

Guadalupe Flores waves an American flag Thursday after taking an oath during an American citizenship ceremony for 180 people in Castroville.

CASTROVILLE — More than 180 new Americans were sworn in Thursday in a citizenship ceremony, part of a surge in the number of legal immigrants seeking to become U.S. citizens.

Two factors are driving the nationwide surge this year, said Doug Keegan, an immigration attorney and program director for the Immigration Project in Watsonville: imminent increases in fees to process naturalization applications and new feelings of insecurity among immigrants.

“Everyone’s expecting a big rush,” he said. “We’re seeing three to four times the normal number of applications.”

There’s an uneasiness even among legal immigrants, especially Latinos, since federal immigration officers arrested 107 people in September for immigration violations in Watsonville, Santa Cruz and Hollister, Keegan said. In a nationwide sweep, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has made more than 20,000 arrests since last year.

For many legal immigrants, Keegan said, anxiety about their futures in the United States turned into action after an announcement on Jan. 31 by Citizenship and Immigration Services that it would increase application fees.

Under the new fees, which take effect on July 30, it will cost $675 to become a naturalized citizen, up from $400.

“Most immigrant families in the Pajaro Valley don’t have the ability to shell out $700 for something whose (immediate) benefit is more psychological,” Keegan said.

In a typical year, Keegan’s office sees 200 applications. So far this year, roughly 350 people, more than triple the normal amount, have already applied.

After a tedious documentation process of months, and in some cases, years, people from 27 countries took their oaths together Thursday in front of the Castroville library.

Monterey County Supervisor Lou Calcagno, the son of Italian immigrants, said during his remarks that the ceremony was a milestone, marking the first major event held at the new library, which opened its doors in September.

Newly minted American citizen Maribel Cuervo left Mexico City nearly 19 years ago, wanted to become a citizen, but simply procrastinated, she said. Cuervo, a Watsonville resident, had already found a good job as a health educator with a local nonprofit and she volunteered on the county arts commission.

“I think it’s important to contribute to the community in some way, said Cuervo, 43, over a hot dog lunch.

As her hyphenated name suggests, Danguole Berulyte-McHargue, another new citizen, is straddling the line between two cultures: the one belonging at first to her U.S.-born husband, and that of her native Lithuania.

“I decided to become a citizen in order to have a full life". [ and steal the white man's future -ed]

2007-07-07T17:50:00.000-07:00

Are you one of the sheep?

2007-07-03T02:26:00.000-07:00

podblanc: | white now

Video For White Folks

2007-07-01T20:30:00.000-07:00

Pod Blanc: http://podblanc.ath.cx

Watsonville, BEFORE AND AFTER

2007-06-25T13:31:00.001-07:00

AVERAGE CITIZEN BEFORE JEW TAKEOVER OF THE 1960s:

AVERAGE CITIZEN AFTER JEW TAKEOVER OF THE 1960s:

Deep Thought of the day

2007-06-25T13:28:00.000-07:00

Why is it only called colonialism when Westerners practice it.

2007-06-25T13:25:00.000-07:00

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody

The White Riddle ←UTube Link

"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

AMERICA MURDERED

2007-06-23T16:34:00.001-07:00

Thanks a lot you dirty genocidal jews and liberal dumbfucks.

WAKE THE HELL UP AMERICA

2007-06-20T14:31:00.000-07:00

From the The Hermit
June 8, 2007

Several of your leaders, such as Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, are speaking out loudly and forcefully against the illegal immigration which is destroying the country. But there is a problem. Despite the forceful language being employed, the real issue is being ducked. The issue is not illegal immigration. The issue is race. Yes, let us use the horrid word. The issue is whether or not these United States shall remain a white country.

Were every illegal immigrant given a green card tomorrow the fundamental issue would remain: White America or La Raza America?

There is an uncanny similarity between the language of the preservation of slavery one hundred fifty years ago and the language of immigration restriction today. The South tried to hide the preservation of slavery behind universal language of “states rights”.

Whites today try to hide the preservation of white civilization behind universal language of illegal immigration. It is time to stop hiding. The men who wrote the Constitution were unabashed white supremacists. They enslaved blacks, they conquered Mexicans and they exterminated Indians. They were proud of it. Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and John C. Calhoun wrote unequivocally of the superiority of whites to all the aforementioned groups. Not one American of the 18th, 19th or early 20th centuries envisioned America as anything other than a free white land. The claim that America should be a “melting pot” of diverse races was, and is., a lie.

Just who is responsible for that lie we shall examine later.

Americans need have no fear of the charge of racism. Racism imply means: White America preserved for whites. That is as it should be. The Mexicans and other Third World races pouring into America are complete racists. They openly proclaim themselves the true “native Americans” and arrogantly announce that they shall drive American whites back to Europe. They openly boast of their agenda and proclaim it to the skies. The media ignore this Third World racism and denounce white racism instead.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Who decided that your land, White America. should be converted into a Third World cesspool? Some of you may blame it on the “liberal media”.Others may blame it on corporations seeking cheap labor. Still others may blame it on corrupt politicians seeking votes. All of these explanations have partial value. But all of them fail the ultimate test. None of them, either taken together or individually,can explain the intense, unremitting slege hammer drive to destroy these United States as a white nation. The people who push this movement do not give a damn what the white population thinks. They did not give a damn what the white population thought when they crammed forced bussing and racial integration down the throat of the country in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Nor is this movement limited to these United States. It exists internationally. South Africa and Rhodesia were destroyed as white countries-with consequences now known to eveyone.

What is this international power which seeks to over run these United States and to make its borders and national soverignty meaningless? This power is easily identifiable. It is the same power which created communism in Russia in 1917. It is the same power which created a great League of Nations in Paris in 1919. It is the same power which drove 700,000 Arabs out of Palestine in 1948-and which sends over one hundred fifty thousand American soldiers to occupy Iraq today. It is the power of the Jews.

Where is the proof of this assertion? The proof is in the history of the immigration laws of these United States. The drive for immigration restriction in America began with the arrival in America of hundreds of thousands of Marxist Jews from Czarist Russia in the 1880’s. These aliens were “UnAmerican”-and the immigration law of 1924 was designed to keep them out. That law deliberately favored the Northern Europeans who had made the country great. The American Jewish Committee and Mr. Louis Marshall screamed-and have screamed ever since. When the 1924 law came up for renewal in 1951, the American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress once again screamed that Nordic racists were trying to discriminate against an oppressed world in general-and Jewish communist refugees in particular. Senator Pat McCarran of Nevada, whose name appeared on the 1952 bill which eventually passed, would have none of it. America would remain a white, Anglo-Saxon land until 1965, when Senator Charles Schurmer and Representative Elizabeth Holtzman succeeded where Senator Jacob Javits and Representative Emmanuel Celler had failed. The Immigration Act of 1965 overthrew the white, Nordic structure of American society and told the Third World: “Come on in”.

Some of you, ladies and gentlemen, may ask: Why would Jews wish to overthrow the United States as a white nation? What have they to gain? To answer this question one must know something of Jewish history. Jews have been expelled from one European nation after another throughout the centuries. In Germany, the population under Adolf Hitler turned against them with deadly force in retaliation for the Jewish communist revolutions post World War One. Jews in America wield tremendous political and economic power. They most definitely have not been using that power to benefit the whites. The Jews know that if American whites ever catch on to what Jews have been doing, then a white nationalist reaction against Jewish power, as in Hitler’s Germany, could occur. It is precisely to prevent that eventuality that Jews have worked unceasingly to shatter the white racial back bone of America. If whites become fragmented and isolated in Third World America, Jewish power can rule unopposed.

It should be obvious to you, ladies and gentlemen, that as America has declined as a white nation, Jewish power has grown ever greater. That correlation is not mere happenstance. It is cause and effect. Some of you, ladies and gentlemen, may be offended by the hard truth. You may regard it as an unwarrated attack on personal friends of the Jewish faith. So be it. Political realities cannot be altered by personal relationships. The hard fact is that America is being destroyed as a white land because the interests of one particular group require that it be so. That group is the Jews. Both logic and the hard facts support the conclusion. Some of you shall be scared off by the Jewish angle. But unless, ladies and gentlemen, you understand why you are being flooded with the Third World, you will not be able to evict them from your land. You will be stymied at every attempt. And then, you will flail about aimlessly, attacking all the scape goats for all the wrong reasons. American whites are in a war for racial survival. The Third World immigrants are the army of the enemy but the Jews are the generals and the suppliers of that army. To destroy the enemy at the gates is essential, but to destroy the enemy within the gates is also essential. For unless that enemy is eliminated, permanently and for all time, the enemy without shall return, again and again.

To be continued…

Who stole our culture? Hint: The answer ain't Kosher.

2007-06-04T15:46:00.000-07:00

Editor's note: This column is an excerpt from Dr. Ted Baehr and Pat Boone's new book "The Culture-wise Family: Upholding Christian Values in a Mass Media World." In the book, entertainment expert Dr. Ted Baehr and legendary musician Pat Boone urge people to make wise choices for themselves and their families so they can protect their children from toxic messages in the culture.

The following is Chapter 10, written by historian Williams S. Lind.

By William S. Lind

Sometime during the last half-century, someone stole our culture. Just 50 years ago, in the 1950s, America was a great place. It was safe. It was decent. Children got good educations in the public schools. Even blue-collar fathers brought home middle-class incomes, so moms could stay home with the kids. Television shows reflected sound, traditional values.

Where did it all go? How did that America become the sleazy, decadent place we live in today – so different that those who grew up prior to the '60s feel like it's a foreign country? Did it just "happen"?

It didn't just "happen." In fact, a deliberate agenda was followed to steal our culture and leave a new and very different one in its place. The story of how and why is one of the most important parts of our nation's history – and it is a story almost no one knows. The people behind it wanted it that way.

What happened, in short, is that America's traditional culture, which had grown up over generations from our Western, Judeo-Christian roots, was swept aside by an ideology. We know that ideology best as "political correctness" or "multi-culturalism." It really is cultural Marxism, Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms in an effort that goes back not to the 1960s, but to World War I. Incredible as it may seem, just as the old economic Marxism of the Soviet Union has faded away, a new cultural Marxism has become the ruling ideology of America's elites. The No. 1 goal of that cultural Marxism, since its creation, has been the destruction of Western culture and the Christian religion.

(Column continues below)

To understand anything, we have to know its history. To understand who stole our culture, we need to take a look at the history of "political correctness."

Early Marxist theory

Before World War I, Marxist theory said that if Europe ever erupted in war, the working classes in every European country would rise in revolt, overthrow their governments and create a new Communist Europe. But when war broke out in the summer of 1914, that didn't happen. Instead, the workers in every European country lined up by the millions to fight their country's enemies. Finally, in 1917, a Communist revolution did occur, in Russia. But attempts to spread that revolution to other countries failed because the workers did not support it.

After World War I ended in 1918, Marxist theorists had to ask themselves the question: What went wrong? As good Marxists, they could not admit Marxist theory had been incorrect. Instead, two leading Marxist intellectuals, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary (Lukacs was considered the most brilliant Marxist thinker since Marx himself) independently came up with the same answer. They said that Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interests, that a Communist revolution was impossible in the West, until both could be destroyed. That objective, established as cultural Marxism's goal right at the beginning, has never changed.

A new strategy

Gramsci famously laid out a strategy for destroying Christianity and Western culture, one that has proven all too successful. Instead of calling for a Communist revolution up front, as in Russia, he said Marxists in the West should take political power last, after a "long march through the institutions" – the schools, the media, even the churches, every institution that could influence the culture. That "long march through the institutions" is what America has experienced, especially since the 1960s. Fortunately, Mussolini recognized the danger Gramsci posed and jailed him. His influence remained small until the 1960s, when his works, especially the "Prison Notebooks," were rediscovered.

Georg Lukacs proved more influential. In 1918, he became deputy commissar for culture in the short-lived Bela Kun Bolshevik regime in Hungary. There, asking, "Who will save us from Western civilization?" he instituted what he called "cultural terrorism." One of its main components was introducing sex education into Hungarian schools. Lukacs realized that if he could destroy the country's traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying its traditional culture and Christian faith.

Far from rallying to Lukacs' "cultural terrorism," the Hungarian working class was so outraged by it that when Romania invaded Hungary, the workers would not fight for the Bela Kun government, and it fell. Lukacs disappeared, but not for long. In 1923, he turned up at a "Marxist Study Week" in Germany, a program sponsored by a young Marxist named Felix Weil who had inherited millions. Weil and the others who attended that study week were fascinated by Lukacs' cultural perspective on Marxism.

The Frankfurt School

Weil responded by using some of his money to set up a new think tank at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. Originally it was to be called the "Institute for Marxism." But the cultural Marxists realized they could be far more effective if they concealed their real nature and objectives. They convinced Weil to give the new institute a neutral-sounding name, the "Institute for Social Research." Soon known simply as the "Frankfurt School," the Institute for Social Research would become the place where political correctness, as we now know it, was developed. The basic answer to the question "Who stole our culture?" is the cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School.

At first, the Institute worked mainly on conventional Marxist issues such as the labor movement. But in 1930, that changed dramatically. That year, the Institute was taken over by a new director, a brilliant young Marxist intellectual named Max Horkheimer. Horkheimer had been strongly influenced by Georg Lukacs. He immediately set to work to turn the Frankfurt School into the place where Lukacs' pioneering work on cultural Marxism could be developed further into a full-blown ideology.

To that end, he brought some new members into the Frankfurt School. Perhaps the most important was Theodor Adorno, who would become Horkheimer's most creative collaborator. Other new members included two psychologists, Eric Fromm and Wilhelm Reich, who were noted promoters of feminism and matriarchy, and a young graduate student named Herbert Marcuse.

Advances in cultural Marxism

With the help of this new blood, Horkheimer made three major advances in the development of cultural Marxism. First, he broke with Marx's view that culture was merely part of society's "superstructure," which was determined by economic factors. He said that on the contrary, culture was an independent and very important factor in shaping a society.

Second, again contrary to Marx, he announced that in the future, the working class would not be the agent of revolution. He left open the question of who would play that role – a question Marcuse answered in the 1950s.

Third, Horkheimer and the other Frankfurt School members decided that the key to destroying Western culture was to cross Marx with Freud. They argued that just as workers were oppressed under capitalism, so under Western culture, everyone lived in a constant state of psychological repression. "Liberating" everyone from that repression became one of cultural Marxism's main goals. Even more important, they realized that psychology offered them a far more powerful tool than philosophy for destroying Western culture: psychological conditioning.

Today, when Hollywood's cultural Marxists want to "normalize" something like homosexuality (thus "liberating" us from "repression"), they put on television show after television show where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual. That is how psychological conditioning works; people absorb the lessons the cultural Marxists want them to learn without even knowing they are being taught.

The Frankfurt School was well on the way to creating political correctness. Then suddenly, fate intervened. In 1933, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party came to power in Germany, where the Frankfurt School was located. Since the Frankfurt School was Marxist, and the Nazis hated Marxism, and since almost all its members were Jewish, it decided to leave Germany. In 1934, the Frankfurt School, including its leading members from Germany, was re-established in New York City with help from Columbia University. Soon, its focus shifted from destroying traditional Western culture in Germany to doing so in the United States. It would prove all too successful.

New developments

Taking advantage of American hospitality, the Frankfurt School soon resumed its intellectual work to create cultural Marxism. To its earlier achievements in Germany, it added these new developments.

Critical Theory

To serve its purpose of "negating" Western culture, the Frankfurt School developed a powerful tool it called "Critical Theory." What was the theory? The theory was to criticize. By subjecting every traditional institution, starting with family, to endless, unremitting criticism (the Frankfurt School was careful never to define what it was for, only what it was against), it hoped to bring them down. Critical Theory is the basis for the "studies" departments that now inhabit American colleges and universities. Not surprisingly, those departments are the home turf of academic political correctness.

Studies in prejudice

The Frankfurt School sought to define traditional attitudes on every issue as "prejudice" in a series of academic studies that culminated in Adorno's immensely influential book, "The Authoritarian Personality," published in 1950. They invented a bogus "F-scale" that purported to tie traditional beliefs on sexual morals, relations between men and women and questions touching on the family to support for fascism. Today, the favorite term the politically correct use for anyone who disagrees with them is "fascist."

Domination

The Frankfurt School again departed from orthodox Marxism, which argued that all of history was determined by who owned the means of production. Instead, they said history was determined by which groups, defined as men, women, races, religions, etc., had power or "dominance" over other groups. Certain groups, especially white males, were labeled "oppressors," while other groups were defined as "victims." Victims were automatically good, oppressors bad, just by what group they came from, regardless of individual behavior.

Though Marxists, the members of the Frankfurt School also drew from Nietzsche (someone else they admired for his defiance of traditional morals was the Marquis de Sade). They incorporated into their cultural Marxism what Nietzsche called the "transvaluation of all values." What that means, in plain English, is that all the old sins become virtues, and all the old virtues become sins. Homosexuality is a fine and good thing, but anyone who thinks men and women should have different social roles is an evil "fascist." That is what political correctness now teaches children in public schools all across America. (The Frankfurt School wrote about American public education. It said it did not matter if school children learned any skills or any facts. All that mattered was that they graduate from the schools with the right "attitudes" on certain questions.)

Media and entertainment

Led by Adorno, the Frankfurt School initially opposed the culture industry, which they thought "commodified" culture. Then, they started to listen to Walter Benjamin, a close friend of Horkheimer and Adorno, who argued that cultural Marxism could make powerful use of tools like radio, film and later television to psychologically condition the public. Benjamin's view prevailed, and Horkheimer and Adorno spent the World War II years in Hollywood. It is no accident that the entertainment industry is now cultural Marxism's most powerful weapon.

The growth of Marxism in the United States

After World War II and the defeat of the Nazis, Horkheimer, Adorno and most of the other members of the Frankfurt School returned to Germany, where the Institute re-established itself in Frankfurt with the help of the American occupation authorities. Cultural Marxism in time became the unofficial but all-pervasive ideology of the Federal Republic of Germany.

But hell had not forgotten the United States. Herbert Marcuse remained here, and he set about translating the very difficult academic writings of other members of the Frankfurt School into simpler terms Americans could easily grasp. His book "Eros and Civilization" used the Frankfurt School's crossing of Marx with Freud to argue that if we would only "liberate non-procreative eros" through "polymorphous perversity," we could create a new paradise where there would be only play and no work. "Eros and Civilization" became one of the main texts of the New Left in the 1960s.

Marcuse also widened the Frankfurt School's intellectual work. In the early 1930s, Horkheimer had left open the question of who would replace the working class as the agent of Marxist revolution. In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question, saying it would be a coalition of students, blacks, feminist women and homosexuals – the core of the student rebellion of the 1960s, and the sacred "victims groups" of political correctness today. Marcuse further took one of political correctness's favorite words, "tolerance," and gave it a new meaning. He defined "liberating tolerance" as tolerance for all ideas and movements coming from the left, and intolerance for all ideas and movements coming from the right. When you hear the cultural Marxists today call for "tolerance," they mean Marcuse's "liberating tolerance" (just as when they call for "diversity," they mean uniformity of belief in their ideology).

The student rebellion of the 1960s, driven largely by opposition to the draft for the Vietnam War, gave Marcuse a historic opportunity. As perhaps its most famous "guru," he injected the Frankfurt School's cultural Marxism into the baby boom generation. Of course, they did not understand what it really was. As was true from the Institute's beginning, Marcuse and the few other people "in the know" did not advertise that political correctness and multi-culturalism were a form of Marxism. But the effect was devastating: a whole generation of Americans, especially the university-educated elite, absorbed cultural Marxism as their own, accepting a poisonous ideology that sought to destroy America's traditional culture and Christian faith. That generation, which runs every elite institution in America, now wages a ceaseless war on all traditional beliefs and institutions. They have largely won that war. Most of America's traditional culture lies in ruins.

A counter-strategy

Now you know who stole our culture. The question is, what are we, as Christians and as cultural conservatives, going to do about it?

We can choose between two strategies. The first is to try to retake the existing institutions – the public schools, the universities, the media, the entertainment industry and most of the mainline churches – from the cultural Marxists. They expect us to try to do that, they are ready for it, and we would find ourselves, with but small voice and few resources compared to theirs, making a frontal assault against prepared defensive positions. Any soldier can tell you what that almost always leads to: defeat.

There is another, more promising strategy. We can separate ourselves and our families from the institutions the cultural Marxists control and build new institutions for ourselves, institutions that reflect and will help us recover our traditional Western culture.

Several years ago, my colleague Paul Weyrich wrote an open letter to the conservative movement suggesting this strategy. While most other conservative (really Republican) leaders demurred, his letter resonated powerfully with grass-roots conservatives. Many of them are already part of a movement to secede from the corrupt, dominant culture and create parallel institutions: the homeschooling movement. Similar movements are beginning to offer sound alternatives in other aspects of life, including movements to promote small, often organic family farms and to develop community markets for those farms' products. If Brave New World's motto is "Think globally, act locally," ours should be "Think locally, act locally."

Thus, our strategy for undoing what cultural Marxism has done to America has a certain parallel to its own strategy, as Gramsci laid it out so long ago. Gramsci called for Marxists to undertake a "long march through the institutions." Our counter-strategy would be a long march to create our own institutions. It will not happen quickly, or easily. It will be the work of generations – as was theirs. They were patient, because they knew the "inevitable forces of history" were on their side. Can we not be equally patient, and persevering, knowing that the Maker of history is on ours?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55833

The Racism and Anti-Semitism Word Games

2007-05-06T00:11:00.001-07:00

By Steven Palese

When whites engage in favoritism toward other whites (and therefore discrimination against non-whites), it’s called “racism”. When other groups engage in favoritism, it’s called “ethnic solidarity”. When whites object to Jewish favoritism, it’s called “anti-semitism”. When you buy into these word games, it’s called being a useful idiot.

THE DUAL PERSECUTION STRATEGY

When Michael Eisner was appointed CEO of Disney, one of the five mega-media conglomerates (Disney has many media assets besides Mickey Mouse, such as ABC), within months he purged upper management to make way for fellow Jews. Had any victim objected to such Jewish favoritism, they would have been subject to neo-McCarthyite persecution for “anti-semitism”. These persecutions are led by Jewish organizations (such as the ADL) and consist of organized blacklists, intimidation and economic strangulation of dissidents. See the Walt-Mearsheimer report on the Israel Lobby for details regarding Neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.

Michael Medved boasted: “The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.”
(”Jews Run Hollywood. So What?,” Moment magazine, August 1996.)

The policy: When whites object to Jewish favoritism they face neo-McCarthyite persecution for “anti-semitism”.

Reverse the scenario. Suppose whites took over Disney, purged most Jews from upper management and replaced them with fellow whites. Would such an attempt by whites to compete on equal terms be tolerated?

When Michael Regan, an Assistant District Attorney expressed concern for white group interests, the mildest form of pro-white favoritism, he was immediately subject to neo-McCarthyite persecution for “racism”. As with “anti-semitism” witch hunts, these are led by Jewish organizations and involve neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.

“Regan’s fate was sealed when the Washington Post published his observation, from an interview at the conference, that “you can see European Christian Americans are an endangered species.” Though there was nothing explicitly “anti-Semitic” in Regan’s comment, the Anti-Defamation League, America’s most feared and effective thought police, promptly attacked his reputation and his livelihood. In a letter to Regan’s superior, the ADL’s regional director for New York decreed: “Those kinds of comments are absolutely inappropriate for a public official to make,” and Regan was promptly out of a job.”
(http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol6no1/61-EditorsNote.pdf )

The policy: When whites engage in favoritism they face neo-McCarthyite persecution for “racism”.

The Dual Persecution Strategy is this policy of both persecuting whites who object to favoritism by others and persecuting whites who get uppity and try the same. This “favoritism for them, persecution for us” double standard creates a systemic competitive imbalance designed to prevent whites from competing on equal terms.

ETHNIC CLOSED SHOPS

An uneven playing field makes it easy for ethnic closed shops to squeeze whites out of any field. The long term consequence is what we see happening in vital organs of society such as media:

“Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews. Murdoch’s News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout — however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so.”
(Los Angeles Jewish Times, ‘Yes, Virginia, Jews Do Control the Media,’ Oct. 29-Nov. 11, 1999 p. 14)

“Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom-CBS, News Corporation and Universal rule the entertainment world in a way that the old Hollywood studio chiefs only dreamed of. And, after all the deals and buyouts, four of the five are run by Jews. We’re back to where we started, bigger than ever.”
(Jewish Week, 9-17-99, 12)

“The greatest concentration of Jews, however, is at the producer level — and it is the producers who decide which stories will go on the air, and how long, and in what order, they will run. In 1982, before a shift in assignments, the executive producers of all three evening newscasts were Jews, as were the executive producers of CBS’s 60 Minutes and ABC’s 20/20. And Jews are almost equally prominent at the ’senior producer’ and ‘broadcast producer’ levels as well as in senior management. When Reuven Frank stepped down as president of NBC News in 1984, for example, he was replaced by Laurence Grossman, who left the presidency of PBS to take the position.”
(Charles Silberman, A Certain People. American Jews and Their Lives Today, Summit Books, 1985, p. 154)

If you buy into “racism” or “anti-semitism” word games, you’re consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you’re supporting an uneven playing field designed to dispossess whites and empower Jews and therefore, by extension, empower the Jewish lobby’s agenda. This includes advancing Zionism (Middle East wars), racial engineering (immigration, diversity and multiculturalism) and censorship (political correctness and “hate” speech laws).

This agenda is set by an interlocking network of over 300 national Jewish organizations and 4000 foundations with a combined annual budget of $6 billion. (http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html ).

Although advancing Zionism is this network’s top priority, promoting mass immigration is a close second,

““Once you get past the Israel issue, it’s near the top of the list of priorities for a lot of groups,” said Haddar Susskind, Washington representative for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA).

“It’s one issue where there’s mostly agreement between progressive grass-roots groups and the big national organizations,” said Mik Moore, director of policy for the Jewish Funds for Justice. “There is a real sense of common cause.””
(http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13852)

INTIMIDATION OF POLITICIANS AND MEDIA

The political process is also affected. James Abourezk, former US Senator from South Dakota, clearly describes how the “anti-semitism” side of the Dual Persecution Strategy keeps the US Congress in line:

“I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear–fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress–at least when I served there–have any affection for Israel or for its Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I’ve heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they’re pushed around by the Lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby’s animosity by making their feelings public.”
(”Former Senator James Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US”, Al-Jazeerah, December 5, 2006.)

James Abourzek also makes clear that the “anti-semitism” side of the Dual Persecution Strategy is what holds those elements of the media not controlled through ownership or staffing in check:

“Secondly, the Lobby is quite clear in its efforts to suppress any congressional dissent from the policy of complete support for Israel which might hurt annual appropriations. Even one voice is attacked, as I was, on grounds that if Congress is completely silent on the issue, the press will have no one to quote, which effectively silences the press as well. Any journalists or editors who step out of line are quickly brought under control by well organized economic pressure against the newspaper caught sinning.”
(”Former Senator James Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US”, Al-Jazeerah, December 5, 2006.)

If you buy into “racism” or “anti-semitism” word games, you’re consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you’re supporting the Jewish lobby’s coordinated intimidation of politicians and media and therefore, by extension, you’re supporting the Jewish lobby’s agenda. This includes advancing Zionism, racial engineering and censorship.

COLLABORATORS AND USEFUL IDIOTS

Collaborators typically get a pay off for selling out. In apartheid South Africa, blacks who were against black group interests and favored white group interests (uncle Toms) were allowed into the black elite. In Judeo-America, whites who are against white group interests and favor minority group interests (collaborators) get to stay in the white elite. White elites who violate this adapted “Code of the Uncle Tom” are filtered out by the Dual Persecution Strategy.

Immigration is an issue that illustrates these contrasting white and minority group interests and the anomalous behavior of white elites. Majority opinion has been against immigration, legal or illegal, since polling began. (http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/publicoparchive.html ). Yet, decade after decade, immigration continues. What is blocking the democratic process?

A recent opinion poll shows that while almost 80% of the public is against mass immigration and 60% consider it a critical threat, only 14% of the opinion elite (members of Congress, the administration, leaders of church groups, business executives, union leaders, journalists, academics, and heads of major interest groups) share the public’s concern. (http://www.vdare.com/roberts/immigrationdictatorship.htm ).

Although collaborators are a minority, they are part of the elite. As opinion polls show, they are not powerful enough to convince the majority that racial engineering (immigration, diversity and multiculturalism) is good. But, being part of the elite, they are powerful enough to block the democratic process and force racial engineering on the public against its will.

Although collaborators agree that an African who wants to become a minority in his own country is either an “uncle Tom” or clinically insane, they themselves are not insane and do not consider themselves such. The vast majority collaborates out of fear of the Dual Persecution Strategy or out of career opportunism, not because they actually believe in Zionism, racial engineering or censorship.

In summary, if you buy into “racism” or “anti-semitism” word games, you’re supporting Zionism, racial engineering and censorship. If you’re white and not part of the opinion elite, you’re collaborating for nothing.

A useful idiot is someone who sells out for free.

What is anti-semitism, and from where does it originate?

2007-04-27T08:33:00.000-07:00

Being Jewish means never having to say you’re sorry, or even answer your critics. It is noted that you never actually addressed any relevant points made. So, come on–tell us how there were not five dancing Jews filming and celebrating the attacks on WTC on 9/11. Tell us how you like to see people in jail for questioning your hoax of hoaxes.

Being Jewish also means thinking that you never have to explain or get to the reality of terms you’ve coined. “Holocaust,” “antisemitism,” these are words that Jews have made up in order to obscure reality.

“Holocaust” is supposed to name the “Systematic extermination of mainly Jews by the German Nazi regime during World War II.” It also happens to be the name of the single alleged historical event that is above questioning. Historians as well as the general public can make outrageous allegations and interpretations of history with not much more than a peep. However, mention that there was a swimming pool and an orchestra at Auchwitz, or that there are records of German soldiers being punished for mildly mistreating prisoners (far milder than what is allowed according to the U.C.M.J.), or that Eli Wiesel never mentioned gas chambers in his book on the “Holocaust,” or that the “soap and lampshades” slander has been quietly withdrawn, or that there was a “six million dead Jews” claim after World War I, or any number of the dozens of facts that show the “Holocaust” for what it is–another Jewish lie.

Those who genuine souls who seek truth need nothing more to pique their interest than the knowledge that, in the countries in question with regard to the “Holocaust,” it is literally against the law for researchers, scholars, and the general public to come to a differing conclusion than the one handed down by the management. Heretics of the “Holocaust” religion are in prison at this moment for saying that the Earth revolves around the Sun coming to a different conclusion about what exactly happened to Jews in Europe during World War II. Philosophers have always had a hard time saying anything conclusive about “truth,” but I think most would agree that truth never needs the force of law and violence behind it.

“Antisemitism.” This would come close to explaining my position if I hated Semites on the mere basis of them being Semitic. I have nothing against Semites, but yes, people (including myself) don’t like Jews! Indeed, I join an illustrious group of men such as Martin Luther, Henry Ford, Voltaire, and hundreds of others in my distaste not because Jews are Jews, but because of what Jews do, like here, here, here, here, and here.

We say “no.” We rebel against your intellectual tyranny and hatred by all means, and we will fight you for every inch. Rebellion is back, and like so many times before in history, the population is waking up to what you Jews are doing.

Feral Peril

2007-04-23T16:42:00.000-07:00

Working towards a White-Free World
Luke O'Farrell 15th April 2007

A night-time curfew on ordinary whites enforced by thousands of newly-recruited, heavily-armed ethnic police. A 50% tax on the earnings of ordinary whites to pay for the installation of 24/7 CCTV in their homes. And all ordinary whites to lie flat on their faces and grovel whenever approached by a non-white. Those just and reasonable measures would probably be in place right now if the recent series of murders in London had been white-on-black rather than black-on-black. Losing so much human potential is bad enough – one of the dead youths was a “talented rap musician” – but at least we know that black killers, and indeed black criminals of any kind, are never responsible for their actions. White racism, the poverty caused by white racism, and the legacy of white-invented slavery drive blacks to crime by corrupting their innate goodness, gentleness and decency.

But if a white even looks sideways at a black – let alone lifts a finger to do that precious black harm – there is no possible excuse and we must take the severest measures in response. Yes, liberal policies on race are based on a scrupulously fair division of vice and virtue. It’s a 50/50 split: Whites have all the vice and non-whites all the virtue. What could be fairer than that? I mean, c’mon, you’d have to be some kinda knuckle-dragging, snaggle-toothed, trailer-dwelling racist to think even for a moment that the following story says anything at all about the nature of blacks:

Girls chant “Kill him” as gang chases schoolboy then stabs him to death

Seven teenagers were questioned by police yesterday after a 16-year-old boy was chased by a mob and stabbed to death. The murder is the fifth involving black youths in London in the past few weeks. Witnesses say that teenage girls egged on the attack with shouts of “Kill him, kill him” before the victim, named last night as Kodjo Yenga, was surrounded. At one point Kodjo raised his arms to fend off blows from sticks. The suspects being held include four 13-year-olds, two 15-year-olds and a man aged 21.

One witness said: “There were about 15 black youths hanging around by the shops. There were girls and boys aged 15 or 16 wearing school blazers. They were getting very rowdy and the girls especially were shouting aggressively.” [Another witness] said that she saw Kodjo being followed and insulted by the group. She said: “There was a group of boys and about three girls. This black boy was in front of them. It looked like he was trying to get away. The girls were screaming, ‘Kill him, kill him’.” (The Times, 16th March 2007)

There is only one race: the human race. Indeed, there is only one form of life: DNA-based life. All of us – human beings, rats, bacteria – are part of the same big family and discriminating against blacks because they look and act a bit different is as superficial and ignorant as discriminating against rats because they look and act a bit different too. Far more unites humans and rats than divides us. Don’t rats bleed red blood just like us? Don’t they want what’s best for their kids just like us? Don’t they need food, water and shelter just like us?

Okay, you might occasionally hear of a rat biting a human, but that’s wholly unrepresentative of the wider rat community. The vast majority of rats are quiet, peaceful creatures who never bite anyone in their lives and just want the chance to improve their lot and raise a happy, healthy family. Exactly the same is true of the superficially different “races” of Homo sapiens, as Britain’s wise and far-sighted prime minister Tony Blair has pointed out:

Tony Blair justifying his existence Britain’s black communities must speak out against gang culture, Tony Blair has said as he renewed promises of tough action in the wake of a series of murders of young people. The Prime Minister insisted recent “severe disorder” was not a symptom of a wider social problem but caused by individuals who needed to be “taken out of circulation”. It would take “significantly toughened” knife and gun laws, intensive police work and the denunciation of the culprits’ communities, he told an audience in Cardiff. Mr Blair said tackling violence was the “missing dimension” to an otherwise successful regeneration of Britain’s cities.

Delivering the Callaghan Memorial Lecture, the PM said: “In respect of knife and gun gangs, the laws need to be significantly toughened. There needs to be an intensive police focus, on these groups. The ring-leaders need to be identified and taken out of circulation; if very young, as some are, put in secure accommodation. The black community – the vast majority of whom in these communities are decent, law-abiding people horrified at what is happening – need to be mobilised in denunciation of this gang culture that is killing innocent young black kids. But we won’t stop this by pretending it isn’t young black kids doing it.” (The Daily Telegraph, 11th April 2007)

No pretending, d’ya hear? A few of their youngsters may misbehave, but you’ve got to understand that the vast majority of blacks are decent, law-abiding people. That’s why Tony Blair has to tell them to speak out against murder. That’s why “gang culture” has grown and flourished among blacks not just in Britain but across the Western world. That’s why handing prosperous white-run Rhodesia over to blacks has created the starving police-state of Zimbabwe. It’s all because the vast majority of blacks are decent, law-abiding people.

Well, if you believe they are, please get in touch for details of the elixir of eternal life I’ve recently invented. Only $5 a bottle! Buy two, get one free! Yep, listening to Blair denounce “pretense” is a highly surreal experience. His entire career has been based on pretense. The picture that accompanied the article above showed him in characteristic pose: mouth open, venting hot air. The French philosopher René Descartes reasoned: Cogito ergo sum – “I think therefore I am”. Bliar reasons: Loquor ergo sum – “I speak therefore I am”. He then confirms his existence by passing more authoritarian laws.

It’s true that his speech is evidence that the ice is breaking on race – perhaps his focus-groups are reporting that British whites are finally waking up – but Bliar still believes firmly in the Central Dogma of Liberalism: that words control the world. Like all other liberals, he thinks that saying a thing makes it so. “Race doesn’t exist.” “Whites and non-whites are identical under the skin.” “Drastically changing the racial composition of Europe and America is all for the best.” Say the words and the world will follow. So liberals think, and if you think different, they’ll make you suffer for it. Take a look at another story about feral black behavior:

Our boy was betrayed: Family’s agony over hounded father shot dead at home

The family of a young father gunned down on his doorstep after a seven-month campaign of intimidation last night accused police of betraying him. Bradley Tucker, 18, faces a life term after he was found guilty yesterday of murdering Peter Woodhams. But Mr Woodhams would still be alive if police had done their job properly, his father said. The 22-year-old TV satellite engineer was shot in the heart last August in front of his fiancée – 24-year-old classroom assistant Jane Bowden – and their three-year-old son Sam after a campaign of intimidation by a gang known as the Royal List Thugs. In January last year he had been slashed across the face in a confrontation with the same group of youths in East London. No one was charged with the knifing, which left Mr Woodhams permanently scarred, and the gang continued their harassment of the young father and his family. (The Daily Mail, 28th March 2007)

Peter Woodhams, white victim Bradley Tucker, black killer

Months of harassment, then casual murder
L-R: Peter Woodhams, Bradley Tucker

Many people have pointed out that there would have been one very quick and simple way for the white victim to get lots of police attention: by using “racist language” against his non-white victimizers. If he’d called them “black bastards”, the police would have come running on the double. If he’d called them “niggers”, the army would probably have been sent for. I mean, slashing someone across the face is just body-crime. Racism is thought-crime – much more serious. It completely contradicts the mission statement of the Jew-owned company that presently runs the West:

Working towards a White-Free World

The rule governing relations between whites and non-whites is that whites must give, give and go on giving until they’ve handed everything over. When non-whites do worse than whites, shrieks of horror and outrage ring out. It’s proof positive that evil white racism is at work – that those poor oppressed ethnics are being discriminated against. So what about when non-whites do better than whites? Is that proof of discrimination against whites? Is it condemned as unacceptable? No, of course not. It’s warmly welcomed, with the proviso that we still have a long way to go:

Ethnic workers “earn more in public sector”

Ambitious ethnic minority workers should sign up for a career in the public sector – where they can expect to earn almost 10 per cent more than their white colleagues – instead of suffering pay discrimination in the business world, economists have found. After several years of government spending growth, as Labour pours cash into schools and hospitals, working in the public sector has become, on average, more rewarding than a job in business, and ethnic minority workers have done particularly well.

In a paper to be presented to the Royal Economic Society’s annual conference in Warwick this week, Monojit Chatterji and Karen Mumford find that by choosing the civil service, ethnic minorities win because they not only avoid the 7.5 per cent pay gap in the private sector but also pocket a 9.3 per cent premium over white public sector staff. “Ethnic minorities earn more than others in the public sector and substantially less than others in the private sector,” the authors say.

A spokesperson for the Commission for Racial Equality welcomed the finding that ethnic minority workers are well rewarded in the public sector, but warned that many non-white workers are still stuck at the bottom of the pile. “There’s some good news in the report that shows that the public sector has become slightly more representative of the population, but unfortunately there are still vast inequalities. In the junior roles you still find large numbers of women and ethnic minority workers and at the top you find a small amount of white, middle-class men. These problems won’t be solved overnight and it’s worrying to see how far we need to go,” the CRE spokesperson said. (The Observer, 8th April 2007)

Tony Bliar denouncing “pretense” is surreal. So is a “spokesperson” for the Commission for Racial Equality welcoming news of racial inequality: non-whites earning nearly 10% more than whites. But “Orwellian” is an even better description of the CRE. In the fictional Britain of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Ministry of Peace worked for war, the Ministry of Plenty for famine, and the Ministry of Love for pain and misery. In Tony Bliar’s real Britain, the Commission for Racial Equality works for racial inequality. Why are non-whites paid more than whites in the public sector? Simple: because objective standards of performance and behavior are not applied to them there. They get jobs because of their skin-color and they won’t lose those jobs unless they go too far even for the fawning liberals who hired them. Stories like this are all too familiar on both sides of the Atlantic:

Jail sentence for NHS fraudster

Nigerian Joseph Oduguwa, one of Britain's countless black criminals A “greedy” hospital manager who helped steal £585,000 [$995,000] from an NHS [National Health Service] trust has been jailed for four years. Joy Henry, 47, was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court for her part in the fraud, believed to be one of the biggest against a single NHS trust. She siphoned money from King’s College NHS Trust over four years, and split the proceeds with her then boyfriend. Henry, a member of the trust’s in-house employment service, added a string of “ghost workers” to the payroll. She then pocketed some of the money they earned. Much of the money had been spent on luxury items, including an Audi convertible car, several holidays in her native Nigeria and many first-class trips to the US. Some £155,000 of the money was said to have been handed to her former boyfriend, Joseph Oduguwa, 42, who is believed to have fled to Nigeria. (BBC News, 24th February 2006)

Five years’ jail for compulsive liar who posed as forensic expert

Gene Morrison, black 'forensic expert' A [black] conman who built his career posing as a forensic expert to dupe victims out of thousands of pounds was jailed for five years yesterday, as police began the task of re-investigating 700 cases in which he was involved. Gene Morrison, 48, bluffed and lied his way through hundreds of trials, for almost three decades, fooling judges, barristers, solicitors and their clients into believing he was qualified. He left school with no qualifications but gave evidence in cases involving armed robbery, rape, death by dangerous driving, unexplained death, drugs offences and questioned paternity. His methods, relying heavily on using bone fide experts and then charging clients double, were unorthodox and unprofessional. He had told one grieving couple that the unexplained death of their son was suicide and charged them £16,500 [$31,000] for work they had never commissioned. (The Guardian, 23rd February 2007)

Prescott employee and wife jailed for £800,000 swindle

I couldn't find a real picture of Robert Adewunmi, but he probably looks something like this A former employee of [the government minister] John Prescott’s office who created a fake housing association to steal £867,000 [$1,470,000] has been jailed for four years. Robert Adewunmi, 32, pretended to be a chartered accountant to get his job and then funded a “lavish lifestyle” for himself and his wife with the money he stole. His wife, Tami, 33, who was a director and secretary of the housing association, was jailed for six months. The couple bought a house in Slough, three in Florida, a timeshare in Florida, a conservatory for their home, cars and three plots of land in Epsom with the stolen money. They also bought a £43,000 investment portfolio, a £10,000 bed, £9,000 of computer equipment, £3,000 of family portraits and photographs, and paid £10,000 off their mortgage.

The court had heard that Mr Adewunmi obtained a job in the budget and data management department of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister as a trouble-shooter in August 2003 by claiming to be a qualified chartered accountant. But although he had registered as a student with the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, he would have had to have passed a further 14 exams to qualify. A month later he invented RTR Housing Association and began making payments to it. Several of the couple’s friends and relations were listed as directors of the housing association. (The Daily Telegraph, 10th March 2006)

Meanwhile, our vibrant Muslim community help keep Britain booming with suicide-bombs. Even liberals couldn’t ignore that sign of how their racial pieties have failed, so the government commissioned a report into how we can “teach Britishness”. Its fatuous proposals have now been condemned by yet another of countless non-whites who have gained their positions not on their merit or intelligence, but on their skin-color:

Britishness lessons “fuel racism”

Baljeet Ghale, leading NUTThe first ethnic minority president of the National Union of Teachers has said ministers fuel racism by ordering schools to teach “British values”. London assistant head teacher Baljeet Ghale told the union’s annual conference that Britain did not have a monopoly on free speech and tolerance. The move only fuelled the “shadow of racism” behind some notions of Britishness, she said. A government spokesman dismissed her claims as “nonsense”.

Ms Ghale, who came to England from Kenya at the age of eight, also criticised Labour’s record on other education issues. She said Education Secretary Alan Johnson had described the “values we hold very dear in Britain” as “free speech, tolerance, respect for the rule of law”. “Well, in what way, I’d like to know, are these values that are not held by the peoples of other countries?” she asked. It was another example of government making policy without talking to those it would most affect. She wanted an education system that valued diversity and accepted her right to support Tottenham Hotspur [a soccer team in London] – but France in the European Cup, Brazil in the World Cup, Kenya in the Olympics and India in cricket but England in the Ashes [a cricket competition against Australia]. She went on: “None of my affiliations make me a less valuable person or less committed to being part of this society, but they do make me a global citizen.”

In her wider attack on Labour’s record, the NUT president gave examples of failures in the school rebuilding programme, such as a new roof on part of a school being removed because the supplier had not been paid. She said the money being spent on academies should be spread more widely around the system and she highlighted the smaller class sizes enjoyed by pupils in Cuba. She called for the end of national testing and league tables and accused the government of having a negative and low expectation of pupils. (BBC News, 7th April 2007)

You might have thought it impossible to make Labour’s proposals look sensible and intelligent, but this ethnic high-flier managed it with ease. She told her audience – packed with fawning white liberals – that she’d like to know “in what way” values like free speech and tolerance are ”not held by the peoples of other countries”. She then “highlighted the smaller class sizes enjoyed by pupils in Cuba”. Did any of those fawning white liberals ask themselves whether free speech and tolerance are firmly-held values in Cuba? Or Zimbabwe? Or Burma? I very much doubt it. They were almost certainly too busy waiting to leap to their feet for the “standing ovation” that Ghale had an inalienable right, as a vibrant ethnic half-wit, to receive at the end of her speech.

And do you think Ghale herself believes in free speech and tolerance? Yeah, about as much as rattlesnakes believe in turning the other cheek. But I agree with her that there are very serious problems in British education. And not just British education. She herself is an excellent symbol of the most serious problem of all: the presence of non-whites in Western schools. If you’ve been fortunate enough to escape the reality, imagine what it must be like for white children to share a school with feral blacks or almost equally feral Muslims or Hispanics. White liberals certainly know what it’s like. That’s why they ensure their own children don’t go to ethnically enriched schools. But “White Flight” is as rational as escaping a fire on the first floor by climbing to the second floor and hoping the fire won’t follow you. Well, unless someone puts it out, it will follow you. And unless someone puts out the fire of mass immigration and ethnic enrichment, it will follow liberals no matter how high they climb. The West is on fire and letting ethnic arsonists like Bradley Tucker, Robert Adewunmi and Baljeet Ghale remain here is a sure way to keep it burning.

SOURCE

"Hate Speech" = Resistance to World Jewish Tyranny and Genocide by Race Mixing

2007-04-23T12:08:00.000-07:00

A group of European Parliament members have submitted a draft declaration to the European Parliament requiring ISPs to take action against online hate speech. Sponsored by Glyn Ford and Claude Moraes of the UK, Viktória Mohácsi of Hungary, and Bernd Posselt and Feleknas Uca of Germany, the declaration calls on ISPs to better monitor the content of the sites they host in order to keep hate speech off the web.

The five European MPs sponsoring the declaration would like to see racism and hate speech banished from the Internet completely, starting with Europe. Should European ISPs not go along, the MPs will try to get the European Commission to enact legislation on the issue, reports Heise Online.

Currently, the EU runs the Safer Internet Plus program, which intends to "promote safer use of the Internet" while fighting against "illegal content and content unwanted by" end users. The MPs are calling on the EC to act within the framework of that program to force ISPs to take hate speech and racist web sites online.

The MPs efforts to ban hate speech face the same fundamental obstacles that other legislative efforts to govern content on the Internet run into. For everything from hate speech to digital piracy, the Internet's carefully designed lack of respect for international borders always thwarts efforts to eradicate certain types of content from the 'Net as a whole.

A related problem that afflicts European anti-hate speech legislation in particular is that laws defining illegal speech differ markedly from one country to the next. It may be illegal to sell Nazi memorabilia in Germany, but keeping eBay's online auctions completely free of such stuff has posed a problem precisely because it's not illegal to sell it in other countries.

Kikes assert social control on business in overwhelmingly homogenous Taiwan.

2007-04-23T09:34:00.000-07:00

Mon Apr 23, 8:27 AM ET

TAIPEI (Reuters) - A Taipei restaurant-bar is letting visitors order "medicine" from a menu and dripping it into their glasses from a transparent ceiling-suspended vat, becoming the latest oddball themed restaurant in Taiwan's capital.
ADVERTISEMENT

As many as 10 visitors can sit around each bed at the D.S. Music Restaurant, a hospital-themed eatery, and watch showgirls dance on weekend nights or chat up "nurses" whose rabbit-ears complement their starched white uniforms.

The Jail puts some of its restaurant tables behind bars, while another serves full-course meals in toilet bowls.

Years ago, a Taipei bistro tried a Holocaust theme, but eventually removed items and photos reminiscent of Nazi Germany brutality under pressure from Jewish groups.

source

What is the Jew?

2007-04-23T09:03:00.001-07:00

A Strange Creature

The Jew is a peculiar creature to say the least. They are characterized by large noses, love of Satan, hatred of Jesus, and love of gold, gems and everything shiny. The average Jew is terribly weak and as a result cannot engage in melee fighting. Because they lack any significant strength, the only close quarter combat they practice is slicing their dicks with small razor sharp knives. Whenever they need to destroy an opponent they silently take over the means of production within their enemy’s society. The best tactic used by these pesky trolls has been to import large amounts of wild Negro dancers from Africa into their foe’s society and enact laws and regulations under which the original people are overrun and out danced by the Negros until they are extinct. The Jew has a close affinity with bagels and abstract art (art that means nothing to anyone unless you’re really fucking stoned and you like pretty colors). Female Jews can be found in large groups hunting and scavenging in Bloomingdales whilst the males prefer Banks, Courts, and Government offices. They are a greedy species and will cheat one another for a shinny penny if necessary. The Jews’ achievements include the creation of masons, communism, abstract art, propaganda, nigger expansion, anti-Christianity, Hollywood, IRS, and Woody Allen.

The younger male Jews can throw their razor sharp hats like a boomerang whilst the older ones can easily crush all white people in a given city with propaganda, - although this particular attack takes a decade or two to cast. The female Jew can kill a man swiftly and silently by letting him fuck her and then releasing the poison acid in her vagina to burn his dick off. Sometimes the female Jew will create a child with a non Jew just so the child can eat the father upon its birth. Both males and females of this dreadful species are extremely hazardous and a Gentile (non-jew) should exercise extreme caution at all times.

Zionism vs. Bolshevism by Winston Churchill

2007-04-23T08:53:00.000-07:00

Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920. Page 5.

ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM.A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE.

By the Rt. Hon. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL.

Some people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: "The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews." Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli's confident assertion.
Good and Bad Jews.The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.
"National" Jews.There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men -- good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent -- in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.

At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.

First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, "I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith." This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the "National Jews" in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia's economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organizations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.

International Jews.In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews.There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

"Protector of the Jews."Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin's authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.

The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.

A Home for the Jews.Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life. The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.

Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

Duty of Loyal Jews.It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.
But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.

Knoxville Rally To Highlight Double-Standards of the Jew Controlled Media

2007-04-16T09:32:00.000-07:00

First Goal of Knoxville Rally Already Achieved
Posted by alex in Alex Linder, Knoxville rally at 7:43 am | Permanent Link

By Alex Linder

Congratulations, people! We have already accomplished one of the main goals of our Knoxville rally: getting the most horrific crime ever committed on the North American continent into the MSM. The Kikencrust has been breached - solely due to Internet pressure, and friend, that means VNN. That means all you posting here and at VNNFORUM.com, and all you making those wonderful branded videos. Make no mistake - without your efforts, Geraldo and Juan NEVER would have mentioned this unspeakable crime. Don’t fool yourself for a minute. They aren’t bothered by the crime - they are bothered by others being bothered by it.

Our pressure has forced the media to their backup position: they have retreated from denying that the crime happened to overt lying, with their dirty, filthy, completely untrue insinuations that the innocent White victims were seeking drugs or partying where they shouldn’t have been. We have scared the media, and they haven’t seen anything yet. You hear me Jerry Rivers, you lying jew? You hear me Juan Williams, you lying nigger?

GREAT JOB, EVERYBODY! TOGETHER WE SHALL OVERCOME!

On Sunday, April 15, 2007, both Geraldo Rivera and Juan Williams mentioned the crime on major cable news channels. A woman named Banderas read out many of the horrible details to a gasping, obvlious viewership.

What they said wasn’t put in the right context, but that’s not the point, and that goes without saying in any case. The point is that the Channon Christian/Christopher Newsom double rape/torture/murder will only grow, grow, grow in the eyes and ears and brains of the, cough, highly conditioned adult kindergartners who make up the American public.

Keep pushing, boys and girls!

NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEW

Following is a blog mention of Christian/Newsom. Feel free to post any blog mentions you see, too, both here and at VNNFORUM.com.

We know the media are controlled by jews, and false-fronted by pretty appeasers. That puts the onus on us to report the truth about what’s going on in AmeriKwa, the term millions are using to denote America-under-the-jews, the nasty, nigger-first, human-last “culture” vibrating out of a wigger’s car near you.

IF NOT US, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN?

source

More Perfidy at the Chronicle

2007-04-13T11:40:00.000-07:00

"Minorities are the emerging face of the subprime crisis"

BOO HOO. Watsonville emerges as the butt of a sick joke on White, e.g. Real America. Before all-white Watsonville was ethnically cleansed and replaced by gang bangers and slum lords, it was a gem of rolling hills and quaint country homes. Now its a pile of shit filled by volatile America-hating aliens. THANKS JEWS.

By Carol Lloyd, Special to SF Gate

Friday, April 13, 2007

When Alberto and Rosa Ramirez began looking for a home, they never imagined that 18 months later they would personify a national real estate crisis. It's not that they bought a house with walls crawling with toxic mold or inherited an insane neighbor next door or, even, God forbid, that they didn't buy at all. They bought, and they love, their slice of the American Dream.

"It's all very nice and beautiful," Rosa tells me through a translator. "The neighborhood is very peaceful. The problem is not with the house at all. It's the price of the house."

Indeed, in a different era (when housing prices were lower), their story might have been one of those bootstrap tales about homeownership transforming immigrant lives. The husband and wife work as strawberry pickers in the fields around Watsonville, and each earns about $300 a week. They have three children. Not only did they dream the impossible dream, they managed to finance it.

It all began when they were talking to another family about escaping their subsidized apartments and getting a real house. The other couple -- Jesus Martinez and his wife, who also have three children -- work as mushroom farmers, earning about $500 a week each when there is work. The two couples decided to pool their resources and begin house-hunting. Given their total income, they estimated that they could afford payments of $3,000 a month. They spotted an ad in the local magazine La Ganga for Maria Avila of Rancho Grande Real Estate and called her.

"We wanted to live in Watsonville," says Rosa. "But [the real estate agent] said the houses there were older and more expensive." One of the first homes they were shown was a "new" four-bedroom, two-bath house in Hollister for $720,000. When the Ramirez's heard the price, they worried that they couldn't afford it.

But the couple says that their real estate agent and broker reassured them it was possible. "The monthly payment was supposed to be $4,800, but then after we bought it, it went up to $5,378," says Rosa, speaking of their zero-down mortgage with a one-month "teaser rate." "Our agent told us that once we refinanced, we could get the payments down to $3,000 or less." For a number of months Avila, who arranged for the loan with New Century Mortgage, paid the difference between what the buyers had said they could afford -- $3,000 -- and the actual loan payment. According to the buyers, this arrangement was supposed to carry them over until the group refinanced.

The money-saving refinance failed to materialize, and eventually, Avila stopped subsidizing their current mortgage. (According to my analysis of interest rates during the period, hitting the magic $3,000 number would have been virtually impossible under any circumstances. An interest-only $720,000 loan at a miraculous 5 percent interest rate [15-year fixed] yields a $3,000 mortgage, but such low mortgage rates weren't available to anyone, much less a laborer with low income, no down payment and no other assets. Plus, that doesn't count another $750 a month in taxes and insurance.) The two families stayed on the same loan, sometimes sacrificing basic necessities, other times borrowing more. "It was very difficult," Rosa says. "Sometimes we would eat less, and we took out personal loans from Bank of America."

(Maria Avila and Rancho Grande Real Estate declined to comment for this story. Earlier this month, New Century Mortgage, the nation's second largest subprime mortgage lender, filed for bankruptcy. It's also facing a federal criminal probe.)

Last November, the families stopped paying their mortgage and sought the advice of Pamela Simmons, an attorney who specializes in predatory-lending cases. Upon reviewing the loan documents, they discovered more bad news. Despite the intention that both couples would be buying the home together (they'd submitted income information for three of the four buyers), the loan was made exclusively in Alberto Ramirez's name. This meant that he was solely responsible for the debt. The couple also discovered that the home wasn't nearly as valuable as they thought: When a new real estate agent valued the house, he told them he'd list it between $560,000 and $580,000. They have sent a letter of demand to Rancho Grande, claiming the brokers breached their fiduciary duties by selling Alberto Ramirez a home he couldn't afford.

How did a strawberry picker earning $15,000 a year qualify for a loan of $720,000? The answer, say the experts, lies in a lending industry that got too innovative for its own good.

Last week, a coalition of civil rights groups, including the National Council of La Raza, the Center for Responsible Lending and the NAACP, called for a national six-month moratorium on foreclosures -- after observing that the subprime crisis disproportionately affected minorities. "The point is to just take time out and provide services to families who might be vulnerable as a result of payment shock," says Janice Bowdler, senior policy analyst for housing for the National Council of La Raza, referring to the hybrid loans that begin with low fixed rates, then jump to adjustable-rate mortgages. Bowdler adds that they are hoping many homeowners can avoid foreclosure by taking advantage of such financial tools as changing their current loan terms or refinancing.

Read the rest here

Lying motherfuckers at jew-owned San Francisco Chronicle...

2007-04-10T08:48:00.000-07:00

...Claim overwhelming majority of Californians favor granting citizenship to illegal invaders. Utter bullshit. This is not going to end without a fight, kikes and lefties. Murdering degrading genocidal nation-wrecking scum, all of you.

Quote chronicle:

"More than four in five California voters support giving legal residence to illegal immigrants, according to a statewide public opinion poll to be released today."

Oh Yeah? According to who? Not me... not my family.. not my friends.. WHO?!?

"It's important that we get a bill done," Bush said Monday. "We deserve a system that secures our borders, and honors our proud history as a nation of immigrants."

Will someone please start packing the guns? These kikes, and piece of shit traitor JORGE BUSH must go NOW.

Read the rest of chronicle's kike/marxist garbage HERE.

Record high for foreign-born players

2007-04-04T08:56:00.000-07:00

So much for America, and the All-American sport of baseball:

Associated Press- The percentage of major league baseball players born outside the 50 states increased slightly to a near record level.

Of the 849 players on rosters at the start of the season, 246 were born outside the 50 states, the commissioner's office said Tuesday. That comes to 29 percent, up from 27.4 percent last year and near the record 29.2 percent set in 2005.

The Dominican Republic had the most non-U.S. players with 98, followed by Venezuela (51), Puerto Rico (28), Canada (19), Japan and Mexico (13 each), Panama (seven), Cuba (six), South Korea (three), Colombia and Taiwan (two apiece), and Aruba, Australia, Curacao and Nicaragua (one apiece).

Proudly the Jews and their leftist pawns proclaim the success of their subversion. Unfortunately for them, its not over yet.

America's Melting Pot: More Like Shit Stew

2007-04-03T18:18:00.000-07:00

Celebrating Cesar Chavez: MLK of the Bean Nigger

2007-04-03T17:11:00.000-07:00

Watsonville inundated with aliens, takes on the forms and heroes of the aliens. Just what in the hell does Cesar Chavez have to do with hip-hop?

Dancers from Synergy Studios strike a pose after performing “Dance Medley” Friday at the Watsonville High School Dance Club Scholarship Fundraiser at the Henry J. Mello Center.
Cesar Chavez weekend began with a whirl of salsa, meringue, folkloric and hip-hop Friday in the Henry J. Mello Center in downtown Watsonville.

High-energy dancing rallied the crowd of more than 200 high school students, parents and people from the entire community for the event put on by the Watsonville High School Dance Club.

“I told the guys, ‘Don’t be nervous, just go out there and dance,’” hip-hop dancer Luis Sanchez said.

Sanchez, who choreographed the hip-hop group’s dances along with his friend Noel Chavez said he first got into dancing because he likes the hip-hop culture.

This kind of crap has become the dominant culture in very large regions of the nation formerly called America. When do real Americans get to start shooting?

Thought of the day

2007-04-01T21:39:00.000-07:00

2007-04-01T21:14:00.000-07:00

VIDEO On Jewish Media Control

Watch this Video HERE

Join the Team!

2007-04-01T21:05:00.000-07:00

The Dispatch is looking for a few good writers from the Central Coast who wish to share their thoughts and pro-white commentary. Join the few of us kicking at the rotten foundation of the New World Order. The jews and their political Left planted this monster right in our back yard. Email me with writing samples.

The Conservatism of Fools: A Response to John Derbyshire

2007-04-01T20:45:00.000-07:00

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald

This is a response to a review by John Derbyshire of my book, The Culture of Critique, that appeared in The American Conservative. In an earlier article, Derbyshire described himself as philo-Semite who traces his attitudes on Jews to his pleasant childhood memories of a local Jewish family and “the numberless kindnesses that I have received at the hands of Jews, friendships I treasure and lessons I have learnt. I cherish those recollections.”3
I find myself now, in middle age, with complicated and sometimes self-contradictory feelings about the Jews. Those early impressions — culture, wit, intelligence, kindness, and hospitality — are still dominant, and I have read enough to know what a stupendous debt our civilization owes to the Jews. At the same time, there are aspects of distinctly Jewish ways of thinking that I dislike very much. The world-perfecting idealism, for example, that is rooted in the most fundamental premises of Judaism, has, it seems to me, done great harm in the modern age…. I also find the theories of Kevin Macdonald (The Culture of Critique) about the partly malign influence of Jews on modern American culture very persuasive — though this is not an endorsement of Macdonald’s theory of “group evolutionary strategies” which I do not understand. And like (I suppose) every other Gentile, I have often been irritated by Jewish sensibilities, and occasionally angered by them.4
These earlier comments on The Culture of Critique appeared in April, 2001. Derbyshire’s evaluation of the book (and its author) has changed a bit, perhaps because the edition reviewed in The American Conservative contains a new preface that tilts the balance in my writing even more on the side of the negative.
For Derbyshire, evaluating Jews is like a business ledger: There are positives and negatives, and for him, the positives vastly outweigh the negatives. However, providing a balance ledger of credits and debits is not a purpose of The Culture of Critique. My purpose is to document Jewish intellectual and political movements — movements led by Jews and motivated by perceptions that these movements would advance Jewish interests. I have tried to document all such movements that I am aware of, but this is not the same as documenting Jewish contributions to civilization or culture. As I note in the Preface, Albert Einstein’s work — obviously an important contribution to physics — does not qualify as a Jewish intellectual movement because it was not motivated by advancing Jewish interests (even though Einstein was a strongly identified Jew). Similarly, my book has no interest in recording fond memories of individual Jews that seem to have formed Derbyshire’s intellectual outlook.
As a result of his generally positive attitude about Jews and Judaism, Derbyshire is, apart from some minor irritations, quite uncritical about Jewish motives and influence, even when they conflict with the interests of people like himself. He implies that non-Jews should understand Jewish motivation to break down the ethnic homogeneity of their own societies while advancing the interests of Israel as an ethnostate. We non-Jews should understand such Jewish behavior because these outcomes are good for Jews. But, somehow he fails to follow through with this logic, imputing malice to people like me who are concerned about the future of their own people in societies where they are becoming minorities surrounded by groups that, like Jews, harbor deep historically conditioned hatreds toward them. It is quite an extraordinary omission and lapse in consistency by Derbyshire. In the end, the logic is as follows: Jews have made wonderful contributions to civilization. Therefore, non-Jews should welcome Jewish efforts to advance their interests even when they conflict with their own. As Derbyshire himself says in another context, the only thing to say of those who voice such sentiments is what Shakespeare’s Bianca would have said: “The more fool they.”
Derbyshire lives in a sort of childlike world in which Jewish interests are legitimate and where Jewish attempts to pursue their interests, though they may occasionally be irritating, are not really a cause for concern much less malice. It doesn’t require an evolutionary theory to realize that good, reasonable people can have conflicts of interest, and that the results of conflicts of interest can be devastating to the side that loses. My view is that modern evolutionary theory gives us a powerful way of understanding why this must be so. Anti-Semites have often portrayed Jews as the embodiment of evil. Consistent with evolutionary theory, however, I have documented that Jews tend to be highly intelligent, good parents, and patriots fighting to preserve their people and extend their people’s power and influence — sometimes at the expense of the interests of other peoples. Many organized groups of Jews have pursued such conservative goals by resisting other groups and behaving aggressively against them. By the same logic, it is legitimate for non-Jews to defend their own ethnic interests. Is this a formula for perpetual conflict? Hopefully not, but the only hope for a just resolution is to recognize the nature of the situation and agree on terms, not to deny the importance of one’s own interests.
Derbyshire’s review begins with a chilling account of how critics of Jews simply disappear from sight — their professional horizons diminished if not entirely ended. One thinks of people like Joe Sobran, William Cash,5 and a host of politicians who have had the temerity to criticize Israel or American support for Israel, or who have called attention to Jewish power and influence in particular areas. Jewish groups have made any critical discussion of Jewish issues off limits, and that’s vitally important because, yes, Jews are a very powerful group. What Derbyshire refers to as Jewish “world-perfecting idealism” is very much with us and is still wreaking havoc in the modern world, everywhere from the erection of a multi-cultural police state in the United States — the origins of which are the general topic of The Culture of Critique — to the current war for the “liberation” and “democratization” of Iraq, a war that is being fomented by Jewish neo-conservative activists based in the Bush administration, congressional lobbying organizations, and the media.6 As with other examples of Jewish idealism, the destruction of Iraq is shrouded in a lofty moral idealism aimed ultimately at securing a rather obvious Jewish ethnic goal — Israeli hegemony throughout the Middle East. That these latest examples of Jewish “world perfecting idealism” also happen to conform rather obviously to Jewish ethnic interests should be of concern to all non-Jews.
Derbyshire dismisses evolutionary psychology as a passing fad, and asks, sarcastically, if in criticizing evolutionary psychology, he is pursuing his own evolutionary goals. Well, maybe. Most of what we humans do is connected only distantly to evolutionary goals. For example, quite a few evolutionary psychologists propose an evolved goal of social status based on commonly accepted standards of scientific evidence,7 but we are very flexible in how we achieve such goals. And it does occur to me that writing critiques of evolutionary psychology and dismissing those who criticize Jews might be one way to attain social status among the predominantly Jewish neo-conservative elite that dominates so much of the conservative media.
Derbyshire complains about my statement that, “The human mind was not designed to seek truth but rather to attain evolutionary goals.” I was merely expressing a principle of evolutionary biology that has been of fundamental importance since the revolution inaugurated by G. C. Williams and culminating in E. O. Wilson’s synthesis: Organisms are not designed to communicate truthfully with others but to persuade them — to manipulate them to serve their interests. We should expect deception and self-deception to be at the very heart of interactions among organisms. This is the subtext of The Culture of Critique: The beguilingly irresistible theories masking an ethnic agenda. I too was once enthralled by psychoanalysis and Marxism.
Derbyshire supposes that the idea of a group evolutionary strategy may be “complete nonsense.” Freed of technical jargon, a group evolutionary strategy refers to the ways people structure groups in order to get on in the world — to attain group goals such regulating their own members (e.g., preventing them from defecting, promoting cooperation with ingroup members, promoting eugenic marriages) and dealing with outsiders (e.g., having different ethical standards for ingroup versus outgroup). I discuss how Jews accomplished these tasks in traditional societies in my book, A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, and I recently applied this sort of analysis to several other groups, including the Overseas Chinese, in the paperback version of that book.8 There are several other good sources, including David Sloan Wilson’s Darwin’s Cathedral,9 where, among other examples, the early Christian Church is described as a non-ethnic form of Judaism that was adaptive at the level of the group in navigating the uncertainties of the ancient world.
My analysis describes the powerful social and psychological forces that have maintained Jewish group loyalty. Derbyshire asks, “From an evolutionary point of view, would not the optimum strategy for almost any European Jew at almost any point from AD 79 to AD 1800 or so have been conversion to Christianity?” But the question is not whether an omniscient Jew in the Middle Ages would choose to remain a Jew, but what forces have kept Jewish groups together over the centuries while other groups have been assimilated or otherwise disappeared. Even if individual Jews would have been better off defecting (some did!), the vast majority did not because of sanctions against relatives who remained Jews, because of powerful, psychologically salient ethnic and kinship ties to other Jews, because of the high level of social and material support available in Jewish communities, because of hostility toward Jews emanating from the wider society, and probably because, despite periodic troubles, Jews were remarkably successful in many times and places, including the medieval period.
Despite Derbyshire’s claim, it is simply not the case that Jews have only been successful since “emancipation.” Jews have very frequently achieved powerful positions: ancient Alexandria and the late Roman Empire; parts of Western Europe during the Middle Ages prior to the expulsions of Jews from most of Western Europe; the Turkish Empire after the fall of the Byzantine Christians and many other places where Jews served alien ruling elites, especially in the Muslim world (e.g., Spain after the Muslim conquest); Christian Spain beginning at least by the late 14th century and extending well into the period of the Inquisition; Poland and other areas of Eastern Europe beginning in the early modern period and extending into the 20th century.10 Perhaps most notably, the elite status of Jews in the Soviet Union had little or nothing to do with the opportunities made available by the Enlightenment, since the Enlightenment had little impact on the Russian Empire.
Group strategies don’t need outgroups. The main thing is that there is group-level organization that regulates individual behavior to conform to group goals. Derbyshire mentions Chinese eugenics, but as important as eugenics may be for understanding the Chinese, it does not necessarily imply a group evolutionary strategy. The most obvious explanation is that the emperor wanted the more intelligent people to run the civil service, and, given the Chinese practice of polygyny and the benefits of high social status, this had a eugenic effect. But this can be easily explained by self-interest on the part of everyone involved; no need to invoke the effects of group structure on individual behavior. On the other hand, in the recent paperback edition of A People that Shall Dwell Alone, I argue that the Overseas Chinese qualify as a group strategy because they live as an organized group among outgroups; they have a consciousness of themselves as being of a different ethnic group than their hosts, they are internally organized (but not nearly so tightly as traditional Jewish communities), and they cooperate in economic enterprises.
Derbyshire rejects my argument that without Jewish involvement, the Bolshevik Revolution and its horrific aftermath would not have happened. The percentage of Jews in early Bolshevik Party congresses is irrelevant to this issue. The questions I ask are: Would the Revolution have occurred without the key involvement of a relatively small number of very talented Jews like Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, and Uritsky who played such prominent roles in the Bolshevik Revolution and the early Soviet government? (In the same way, one can reasonably ask whether the neo-conservative revolution in U.S. foreign policy would have happened without the critical contributions of Richard Perle, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Elliott Abrams, and David Wurmser, to name only some of the most prominent Jews involved. Small numbers of highly talented, closely cooperating people can have enormous influence.) Would the Revolution have been sustainable in its early stages without the involvement of large sections of the Jewish community who came to staff the Soviet bureaucracy, most notably the Secret Police? Were the most powerful non-Jews accurately described as philo-Semites — “Jewified non-Jews,” to use Albert S. Lindemann’s term?11 Were Jews an elite group in the Soviet Union at least until anti-Jewish attitudes began to be government policy after World War II? Did Jewish Communists and other leftists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere identify as Jews? I see no reason to change my views on these issues as a result of Derbyshire’s comments.
Similarly, Derbyshire states that Jews “were not the sole, nor even the prime, movers in [the] downfall” of European dominance in the U.S. without providing a concrete alternative. I have never stated that Jewish intellectual movements and interest groups were the sole force, but I do indeed maintain that they were by far the most important. On the critical topic of immigration, there simply was no other force that energetically pursued the goal of multi-ethnic immigration in the period prior to 1965 apart from Jewish organizations or organizations composed partly of non-Jews that were funded, organized and staffed by Jews.12 I am scarcely alone in this opinion. Consider these comments of Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Davis Graham:
Most important for the content of immigration reform [i.e., loosening], the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s…. Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration.
And beyond the transformations being wrought by the sea change in immigration policy, I think it inconceivable that the current regime of what Derbyshire terms “racial guilt, shame, apology, and recompense, accompanied by heroic efforts at social engineering (’affirmative action’)” could have been built without the influence of the intellectual and political movements described in The Culture of Critique. As Derbyshire notes, this regime is inherently far less stable than what went before, and one can only shudder at what the future holds throughout the Western world.
It is always difficult to imagine that 3% of the population could have such enormous influence on culture and public policy, but successful lobbying efforts by small, committed special interests are commonplace in American politics, not only among ethnic lobbies but among business interests, farming groups, unions, professional organizations, and even gun enthusiasts. An obvious example is U.S. policy in the Middle East. Here we have a record of an incredibly effective, well-funded, intensive lobbying effort carried out over several decades. The historical evidence reviewed in Chapter 7 of The Culture of Critique shows that Jewish organizations carried out a similar campaign in an effort to alter U.S. immigration laws and that they were by far the most important force in changing these laws, often taking pride in the part they played.
Derbyshire does not think it hypocritical for Jews to promote multiculturalism in the U.S. while wishing to maintain Jewish ethnic dominance in Israel. The hypocrisy comes from the fact that, as I note in Chapter 8 of The Culture of Critique, the Jewish advocacy of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate coincided with a major effort by Jewish organizations and Jewish-dominated intellectual and political movements to supplant the prevailing view of the United States as a European Christian civilization with a European ethnic base. Especially hypocritical is that the disestablishment of the European basis of American identity was performed with appeal to universalist Enlightenment ideals of justice and individual rights, while it pathologized the ethnocultural basis of American civilization that had become an important foundation of American identity by the early decades of the 20th century. Although it is common for defenders of Israel to describe Israel as a democracy based on Western political ideals, I have yet to see any important Jewish organization or intellectual movement pathologize the ethnic basis of Israeli society or challenge the many ways in which Jewish ethnic interests are officially recognized in Israeli law and custom (e.g., the Law of Return). Indeed, the American Jewish community has been complicit in the ongoing ethnic warfare in the Middle East that has resulted in the dispossession, degradation, and large-scale murder of the Palestinians.
Derbyshire accuses me of being one of those who would prefer “a return to the older dispensation” — the older cultural and ethnic mix characteristic of the United States until the changes inaugurated in the last 35 years. I plead guilty to this charge. That regime was stable and it was good for people like me (and Derbyshire), and even for the American Jewish community who saw the modest, low-profile, non-violent character of anti-Jewish attitudes that were fairly common prior to World War II dwindle to irrelevance in the postwar period. Nothing wrong with that.
The dispossession of Europeans is the ultimate defeat — an evolutionary event of catastrophic proportions for people of European descent. Whatever the contributions of Jewish “entrepreneurs, jurists, philanthropists, entertainers, publishers, and legions upon legions of scholars,” they could never make up for this cataclysmic loss and for the political instability and chronic ethnic tensions that have been unleashed by the Jewish intellectual and political movements discussed in The Culture of Critique. Further, as The Culture of Critique attempts to document, a very high percentage of the Jewish contribution to culture has been used to advance Jewish ethnic interests. The only exceptions are advances in technology and basic science, but does anyone seriously suppose that technological advances like the atomic bomb mentioned by Derbyshire would never have been discovered without Jews? (Germany, certainly, was very close.) It may be that these advances would have taken longer, but there is no question that they would have happened without Jews. After all, with a mean IQ of 100 and far larger numbers, European populations undoubtedly have far more individuals of the requisite IQ to make the stupendous contributions to culture that have occurred in recent centuries.
Western cultures have produced a long list of ethnically European geniuses in every field of science and art, from Plato and Aristotle down to the present. Pity the poor English who expelled the Jews in the Middle Ages and were thus restricted to the meager cultural contributions of Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Newton, and Darwin even as they vastly expanded their numbers and the territory controlled by their people. Can anyone seriously suppose that the West would be unable to produce a brilliant high culture without Jews or that the Jewish contribution is of irreplaceable value? And recall that my argument in The Culture of Critique is that many of the most important Jewish contributions to culture were facilitated not only by high IQ but by closely cooperating, mutually reinforcing groups of Jews who were centered around charismatic leaders and excluded dissenters. In other words, their accomplishments are due in large part to the fundamental cultural forms of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, not to any inherent worth in what was produced. The sorry records of psychoanalysis, Boasian anthropology, Marxism, and the Frankfurt School are far more a testimony to Jewish identity and group cohesion than they are to anything resembling science.
Derbyshire acknowledges that the Jewish contributions to culture discussed in The Culture of Critique have been made with an eye to advancing Jewish ethnic interests. This is certainly a very sizeable portion of the entire Jewish contribution to culture during the period I discuss, but advancing Jewish interests by contributing to culture goes far beyond these movements. As I attempt to show in the preface to the recent paperback edition of The Culture of Critique, Jewish contributions to entertainment and the media have often had the function of promoting positive images of Judaism and multi-culturalism and negative images of Christianity and European ethnic interests and identification. Derbyshire describes his love of songs like White Christmas that have come to define how Christmas is experienced. However, such songs are also part of the Kulturkampf in which Christmas has been converted into a secular and commercialized event; as such it represents a kind of cultural subversion. As Philip Roth noted, “God gave Moses the Ten Commandments and then he gave Irving Berlin Easter Parade and White Christmas, the two holidays that celebrate the divinity of Christ … and what does Irving Berlin brilliantly do? He de-Christs them both! Easter turns into a fashion show and Christmas into a holiday about snow.”13 In recent decades, a major thrust of Jewish influence on culture has been the promotion of the Holocaust as the fundamental moral touchstone and intellectual paradigm of the contemporary Western world. (I recently came across a reference stating that there have been over 170 Holocaust films since 1989.14)
Jewish entrepreneurs and philanthropists may have indeed contributed to economic growth, but they have also lavishly funded Jewish causes — causes that typically oppose the ethnic interests of European Americans. Jews constitute more than a quarter of the people on the Forbes Magazine list of the richest four hundred Americans, 45% of the top 40 richest Americans, and one-third of all American multimillionaires.15The beneficiaries of this wealth include 4000 foundations controlled by Jews and 300 national Jewish organizations, the latter with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billion — a sum greater than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations. Jewish entrepreneurs and philanthropists like hedge-fund manager Michael Steinhardt, Charles and Edgar Bronfman (co-chairs of the Seagram Company), bingo parlor magnate Irving Moskowitz (who funds the settler movement in Israel), the notorious Marc Rich (who funds Birthright Israel, a program aimed at raising Jewish consciousness), George Soros (who funds pro-immigration organizations in the United States and in a variety of European countries), film maker Steven Spielberg (head of the Shoah and Righteous Persons foundations), Leslie Wexner (owner of the Limited and Victoria’s Secret), Laurence Tisch (chairman of the Loews Corporation), Charles Schusterman (owner of an oil-and-gas business in Tulsa), and Mort Mandel of Cleveland (former distributor of electronics parts) have used their money to advance Jewish causes such as Israel and increasing Jewish consciousness and commitment among Jews.16 Wealthy Jews are by far the largest contributors to the Democratic Party and are very significant contributors to the Republican party,17 ensuring that Jewish interests will be heeded throughout the U.S. political spectrum. Whether Jewish success in business has had a measurable effect on economic growth is difficult to know. What we do know is that it has come with an enormous cost to the ethnic interests of European Americans.
In concluding, I call attention to the challenge for evolutionary psychology in trying to understand the complete lack of ethnic identification of so many elite Europeans such as John Derbyshire. He is only the tip of a massive iceberg. I have sketched a theory of why this might be in the Preface to the paperback edition of The Culture of Critique: a relatively weak sense of ethnocentrism resulting from our European evolutionary past combined with the influence of the Jewish intellectual and political movements I describe and its amplification in the media; the powerful opprobrium and, increasingly, police state controls that have become attached to criticism of Jews and Israel; and the heady inducements to conform to the interests and views of a powerful minority. Having read Derbyshire’s account of his childhood, one might add to the model two more variables: socialization in a very benign Jewish milieu and deep reverence for the cultural accomplishments of Jews. In the end, Derbyshire is the epitome of that sad and paradoxical figure, the Judaized intellectual discussed in The Culture of Critique for whom Jewish attitudes and interests, Jewish likes and dislikes, now constitute the culture of the West, internalized by Jews and non-Jews alike. It is a mindset that is leading Europeans directly to the fate of the Israelites who stray from God’s way as described in Deuteronomy (28:62): “And ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude.”
Endnotes
1. J. Derbyshire, The Marx of the Anti-Semites, The American Conservative, March 10, 2003.
2. Please send correspondence to Kevin MacDonald; Information on my books can be obtained here.
3. J. Derbyshire: The Jews and I, National Review Online, April 10, 2001.
4. Ibid. See also Derbyshire’s article, “Is Anti-Semitism Dead,” National Review Online, August 21, 2000.
5. Derbyshire (ibid.) is critical of the response to the “thoughtful and entirely unthreatening way” in which William Cash described
the dominance of Jews like Steven Spielberg, David Geffen, and Jeffrey Katzenberg in Hollywood. To the amazement of the Spectator’s editor (who was Dominic Lawson — Jew!) this innocuous article caused a storm of outrage in the U.S.A. The young author, William Cash, was denounced from the pulpits of political correctness — that is, from the Op-Ed pages of the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times. Prominent American Jews like Leon Wieseltier went into high-hysterical mode, denouncing Cash as the new Julius Streicher and so on. The storm went on for weeks, led by a howling mob of buffoons — Barbra Streisand, for example — who had certainly never read, nor probably even heard of the Spectator up to that point. (I have been reading it for 30 years, and have also written for it.) It was a display of arrogance, cruelty, ignorance, stupidity, and sheer bad manners by rich and powerful people towards a harmless, helpless young writer, and the Jews who whipped up this preposterous storm should all be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
6. The war against Iraq is far too important to avoid a complete public discussion of the motives of all of those who are pushing for this war, including neoconservative Jews intent on furthering Israeli interests in the Middle East. Jews must never be represented as monolithic, but we must have ways of discussing Jewish influence’talking about specific groups of Jews, their Jewish identity, and their actual influence on public affairs, as we do with other ethnic groups. There is no question that neoconservative Jews in the Bush administration are having an enormous influence on public policy and that their motives are to aid Israel. For example, Richard Perle, David Wurmser, and Douglas Feith’all present employees of the U.S. Defense Department’signed the 1996 document ‘Securing the Realm’ which advocated removing Saddam as a goal of Israeli foreign policy. This document was prepared for an Israeli foreign policy think tank (Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies) and presented to the Israeli government. Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz is a protégé of Perle and has long advocated removing the Iraqi leadership. He has close personal and family ties to Israel (B. Keller, The Sunshine Warrior. New York Times Magazine, September 23, 2002). The neoconservative influence is increased because virtually the entire organized Jewish community (but certainly not all American Jews) has become pro-Likud. The Likud Party, led by Ariel Sharon, is strongly in favor of a U.S.-led war against Iraq. Neoconservatives have ready access to key sectors of the U.S. media (The Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal, Fox News). For example, Bill Kristol is editor of The Weekly Standard. He is also a Fox News political analyst, and he is Chairman of the Project for a New American Century. Kristol has a long record of opposing the current Iraqi regime and is an ardent supporter of Israel (see, e.g., the PNC’s letter to President Clinton, dated January 26, 1998). See also:
1.) Whose War? by Patrick J. Buchanan2.) Practice to Deceive by Joshua Marshall3.) The Men From JINSA and CSP by Jason Vest4.) Israel’s Role: The ‘Elephant’ They’re Talking About By Ami Eden5.) A Rose By Another Other Name: The Bush Administration’s Dual Loyalties, by Kathleen and Bill Christison6.) The Israel lobby, by Michael Lind
Addendum, April, 2006: In addition to these references, see
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, by John Mearsheimer and Steven Walt.
Understanding Jewish Influence: A Study in Ethnic Activism by Kevin MacDonald
7. E.g., J. Barkow (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Perspectives on Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; Buss, D. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Evolution, Culture, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29, 119-149.
8. K. MacDonald, A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora Peoples. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse Books, 2002. See also my review of D. S. Wilson’s Darwin’s Cathedral.
9. D. S. Wilson, Darwin’s Cathedral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002. See also: Hilton, A. & Obermeyer, G. (1999). Evolutionary strategies of religious groups: Kinship and altruism, cultural segregation and migration in early and modern Anabaptist communities in Europe and America. Paper presented at a conference, sponsored by the Royal Institute for Interfaith Studies (Jordan), on: Migration and Culture Contact: patterns of confrontation and coexistence in a changing world. October 11-15, 1999, The Meridien Hotel, Amman; Miele, F. (2000). To Populate is to Rule: Review of The Cousins’ Wars by Kevin Phillips. Population and Environment. 21 (3) 347-358.
10. See K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998. (Available from the author.)
11. A. S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 433. Lindemann notes that the top non-Jews in the Bolshevik movement, including Lenin and Dzerzhinsky (Head of the Cheka [Secret Police]), might be termed ‘jewified non-Jews’ — ‘a term, freed of its ugly connotations, [that] might be used to underline an often overlooked point: Even in Russia there were some non-Jews, whether Bolsheviks or not, who respected Jews, praised them abundantly, imitated them, cared about their welfare, and established intimate friendships or romantic liaisons with them.’
12. Hugh Davis Graham, Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America (New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 56-57).
13. In: J. Rosen. White Christmas: The Story of a Song. London: 4th Estate (A Division of HarperCollinsPublishers), 2002, p. 157. Rosen mentions “the sheer chutzpah that compelled a refugee from a pogrom-scourged corner of Siberia … to write a Christmas anthem that buried all traces of the holiday’s Christian origins beneath three feet of driven snow” (pp. 164-165.)
14. Sterritt, D. The one serious subject Hollywood doesn’t avoid. The Christian Science Monitor, November 22, 2002.
15. Silbiger, S. (2000). The Jewish Phenomenon : Seven Keys to the Enduring Wealth of a People. Atlanta, GA: Longstreet Press.
16. Goldberg, J. J. (1996). Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; M. Massing, Should Jews be parochial? The American Prospect.
17. Lipset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1995). Jews and the New American Scene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Let’s You and Him Fight, Says Jew Neocoward

2007-03-30T11:45:00.000-07:00

From Vnn:

Committing suicide, one step at a time

by Benjamin “I’ll lie, if you’ll die” Shapiro

Posted: March 28, 2007

How far will the West be pushed?

Translation: jew spends every waking moment subverting the West, then leaps to rally its military the minute it finds it useful in taking out potential enemies of Israel. There is very little of the jew’s day not spent in manipulating others for its own benefit.

For decades, Iran has embraced a strategy of carefully feeling its oats, prodding at the West, testing our mettle in inches.

Those who think jews make their way by hard study and native brilliance rather than nepotism need to consider that the student who wrote this ridiculous sentence was admitted to Harvard Law School. You can be sure no simple goy who wrote (syndicated!) crap like that would make the cut, but jews admit jews, just as jews discriminate against non-jews in every single sector in which they’ve achieved control, and that most certainly includes Harvard and its law school.

“…carefully feelings its oats…” - classic

Jews such as Ben spread lies about WMDs. They ignore the fact that Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and threatens every country around it. This real and growing danger goes unmentioned while the captive media focus on the apocalyptic possibility of Iran developing a single nuclear weapon for self-defense. Double standard? Of course. That’s the beauty of owning the media: you can lie all day long, and the public is too dumbed down to catch on. Demonize and destroy, demonize and destroy - the new tax and spend, itz! Whites supply the blood and money, jews supply the goading and lies.

Now, like Germany in 1938, Iran is beginning to realize that the West will do nothing to stop it. Crippled by a pathological aversion to war,

Even for a jew that’s a gasper. “Pathological aversion to war”? How many countries are American troops in again? Aren’t our boys being killed fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq at this very moment?

Madly pumping the accelerator, the jews refuse to acknowlege their American Buick Boobicus is out of gas.

In the end, they’ll abandon the car and trudge back to town, cursing about our unreliability. Why, brave boys like Bengy would have been willing to sacrifice the very last Aryan youth, rather than Israel go unexpanded.

America and Britain sit by silently as Iran develops nuclear weapons, fosters terrorism in Iraq and targets Western interests for total annihilation.

This reads like a joke, but remember this pup is a syndicated columnist, a major-house author, and a student at Harvard Law School. The jews have spent decades dumbing down the public through anti-intellectual public schools, resulting in a market for this kind of comic-book politics. America and Britain sat by silently when jews took over their governments, resulting in slavish and extremely expensive support for Israel, at the expense of relations with the rest of the known world. The beautiful part here is that Israel, however many nukes it has, grows increasingly isolated from and hated by the rest of the world, and for very good reasons. Israel is nothing but an asylum for swindlers. It is a threat to every nation in Europe, not just the Middle East. The Internet, thank god, allows the rest of us to see what’s going on. Even the dogs at Free Republic are beginning to sense they’ve been duped. “My kid died in Iraq for Israel, and all I got out of it was a giant tax bill and a draft letter calling my other son to go fight Iran.”

Never ever is little Benji’s ass on the line.

You ever notice that about jews?

They prefer to use you to do their dirty work.

They’re more the sit around eating and lying and profiteering type.

It’s clear what the parasite gets out of its relationship with the host. What do we get out of our relationship with the jew? Nothing but scorn, lies, tax bills, and spilled blood. The jews are a parasite using us for their own ends, while filling our ears with garbage about a West they, by definition, are not part of, and in fact hostile to.

Iran’s latest test for the West is its abduction of 15 members of the British Royal Navy. Iran feebly claims those sailors were found in Iranian waters. In truth, Iranian forces crossed into Iraqi waters to take those British sailors and marines prisoner. The abduction was no innocent mistake by the Iranians – it was planned in advance, designed to achieve the release of five Iranian Quds Force members arrested in northern Iraq, designed to place pressure on the West more generally.

Yes, we’ve heard lies about who was where back in Lebanon, where jewish soldiers were captured. If the jew says it, the likelihood the opposite is true approaches 100%. Mossad carries out false flag after false flag; Israel either murders Americans itself (USS Liberty), or allows them to be murdered without passing on the information they are to be attacked (Beirut barracks bombing), but always the other guy is the troublemaker and “threat” according to koshervision.

Hours before the U.N. was to decide on the issue of harsher sanctions against Iran, the Iranians seized the British. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who was scheduled to speak to the U.N. regarding the sanctions, cancelled his appearance.

The Western response has been tepid. Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain says British efforts to obtain the sailors’ release will enter a “different phase” if current negotiations fail. That “different phase” would include releasing evidence that the Iranians had entered Iraqi territory to grab the British sailors. That “different phase” would not, however, entail expelling Iranian diplomats from Britain or contemplating military action. In other words, Britain will act miffed, but not miffed enough to secure the release of their troops.

Which is precisely the course the Brits ought to take, according to the international left. Like Agamemnon, the international left is willing and eager to sacrifice countless military Iphigenias to appease radical Islamist gods.

How many Americans have been sacrificed to appease the bloodthirsty jewish neocons running our government? Six thousand and counting. How many innocent Iraqis have died in the jewish liberation campaign? An untold number, but quite possibly in the seven figures.

Useful idiots like former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray are coming out of the woodwork to blame coalition forces for Iran’s hostility. “In international law the Iranian government was not out of order in detaining foreign military personnel in waters to which they have a legitimate claim,” Murray told Al Jazeera. “For the Royal Navy to be interdicting shipping within the 12-mile limit of territorial seas, in a region they know full well is subject to maritime boundary dispute, is unnecessarily provocative.” Loudmouth ignoramus bovine Rosie O’Donnell has likened Iran’s seizure to the Gulf of Tonkin incident, implying that coalition forces led by America would use the seizure as a manufactured excuse to go after Iran.

Yes, Americans have never done that, except for Tonkin Gulf, Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, WTC demolitions, Oklahoma City, and on and on. As always, when the jew runs its mouth, down is up and black is white.

Murray and O’Donnell aren’t alone. The newly minted Democratic Congress has already demonstrated its willingness to undermine American credibility with regard to Iran. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has announced, “Congress should assert itself and make it very clear that there is no previous authority for the president, any president, to go into Iran.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid agrees: “The president does not have the authority to launch military action in Iran without first seeking congressional authorization.”

The right thing to say, but we’ll see what they do.

Meanwhile, the Democratic Congress has continued to pursue a policy of pre-emptive surrender in Iraq,

How can we surrender to a country that we attacked? At the behest of liars like jew Shapiro? Only a jew could describe pulling our troops out of a destroyed country as surrender. As always the jewish parasite mimics the Aryan’s language of honor. But it is just that - mimicking. The jew uses the language of honor — bravery, appeasement, surrender — but he does not feel it. They are just words to sucker in those who will serve his purposes. If the jew were really concerned, he might put his own ass on the line. But that’s the one thing the jew never does. You saw how quickly the kikes, even with their vastly superior, America-supplied weaponry tired of doing actual physical battle with determined fighters of Hezbollah? That got old real quick, fighting people who could fight back. Easier to kick back at Harvard and pluck heartstrings in flyover. Make use of the well constructed legends to call up yet another army to do yet another real battle with yet another imaginary enemy.

emboldening both violent sectarian militias and the Iranian regime. The Democrats’ proposed timetable proposes precisely the strategy that led to devastating defeat in Vietnam – which is, of course, what the Democrats want, since they can then blame President Bush for “his” disastrous Iraq policy.

Like every jew ever heard of, Shappy refuses to take any responsibility for the failed policies he advocated for years. Being jewish, and controlling the media, means never having to say you’re sorry. You just put on a new mask, don a new disguise, and have right back at ‘em with a fresh round of lies. It will keep going like this until the Shabby “Shappy” shapiroes are done away with physically.

Two centuries ago, several Muslim states seized American ships and sailors on the high seas, demanding tribute from the United States. For decades, the Americans complied. Then they created a navy. Under Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, America struck back, forcing Tripoli, Tunis and Algiers to sign treaties forswearing piracy at gunpoint.

One century ago, Moroccan bandit Mulai Ahmed er Raisuli kidnapped supposed American citizen Ion Perdicaris. Teddy Roosevelt famously responded that he wanted “Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead,” and dispatched seven battleships and a marine detachment to Morocco. The incident ended with the safe return of Perdicaris.

In 1967, the jews of Israel murdered 34 American sailors on the USS Liberty. In 1983, the jews of Israel refused to pass along information that the marine corps barracks in Lebanon were to be attacked. Hundreds of Americans were killed.

The U.S., under jewish control, continued to funnel money to Shapirostan at the tune of $10 million a day.

America’s real enemy — only enemy — is the jews. Whether in Isarel or at Harvard.

Today, a dramatically hostile Iranian government – a government that has sent its soldiers across the Iraqi border to harass Iraqi and American troops, a government that supports terrorism throughout the Middle East, a government that is quickly developing nuclear weapons for use against our allies, a government that kidnaps coalition soldiers and holds them on trumped up charges – is met with nothing but sighs of indignation and huffy posturing. How long will it be before the West tells Ahmadinejad he has “missed the bus”? And how long after that before the West is forced to face up to the consequences of its own fecklessness?

This is pure comic-book fantasy. The reality is that America is controlled by jews, and those jews are using our troops and money to attack innocent people. When do we begin attacking the guilty jews like Shapiro?

[Original]

Santa Cruz Sentinel Purchased by Wall Street Journal

2007-03-29T14:40:00.000-07:00

The Sentinel recently announced its purchase by jew dominated Wall Street Journal:

Dow Jones & Co. announced a new organizational structure Wednesday that will divide the company into three business units, one of which will include both the print and online editions of The Wall Street Journal.

It was the first big move by Richard Zannino, the former chief operating officer of Dow Jones who took over as CEO from Peter Kann at the beginning of February. Kann has remained as chairman.

Dow Jones owns Ottaway community newspapers, which the Santa Cruz Sentinel is part of.

If you doubt the media and government are run by and for a highly leveraged, highly wealthy mafia of jews and jew-appeasers, this purchase of the sentinel is yet another example.

Background on jewish media manipulation:
http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html
http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol6no3/TOQConnellyV6N3.pdf

For more information on Dow Jones Co. and jew Kann see:
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-kann.html

Ohnoez! Border Controls Means A Few More Cents for Strawberries

2007-03-29T14:20:00.000-07:00

Apparently the newspapers abide by the philosophy that too much propaganda is never enough. In this case, Watsonville's only notable "industry" (Agriculture), is simply another opportunity to stab Americans in the back. What should have been a story on remarkable Strawberry yields turned out to be a pro-immigrant lecture.

Many farmworkers never left after the last season because the strawberry cycle is nearly year-round, said Jess Brown of the Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau.

“I have not seen workers moving around like they used to for five years,” said strawberry farmer Elia Vasquez. “Workers are more settled.”

Well, these 'settled' people are no good for agitating against traditional America and the status quo, eh subverters? We must solve this by bringing in more money-grubbing, America-hating trash:

Still, Vasquez said last year’s farm labor shortage will likely continue this year due to more severe enforcement against illegal immigration.

“They need to leave a window open for people to come and work in agriculture, whether through permits or whatever, or we are going to lose agriculture in the U.S.,” Vasquez said.

Who gives a rat's donkey what a "Vasquez" says about American immigration enforcement? Americans are perfectly capable of planting and picking fruit. Anyone who says otherwise is a Vasquez or a jew. Thanks to these fools, Watsonville is just another Mexican dung clump.

Jewsmedia Cover Up Brutal Slaying of White Couple By Black Scum

2007-03-29T13:48:00.000-07:00

This one comes from the blog vanquishing georgia:

In early January of this year a young White couple was carjacked, robbed, abducted, tortured, raped, mutilated and murdered by a pack of vicious feral negroes in Knoxville, Tennessee. The national Controlled Media will not report this story. Bill O'Reilly has been completely silent. Nancy Grace hasn't uttered a word. Even the local media in Knoxville has joined with local officials in an attempt to stop the general public from knowing what happened to these two young White people at the hands of free-range niggers in Knoxville, Tennessee.

On January 7, 2007 Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were carjacked and abducted by a group of negroes, while on a date in their hometown of Knoxville. The couple was taken to a rental house on Chipman Street and forced inside at gunpoint.

Inside this den of terror, Channon Christian, 21, was forced to watch as her boyfriend Christopher Newsom, 23, was beaten and sodomized by the untamed negroes. Newsom's penis was severed. He was later shot and wrapped in a blanket, set on fire and his body was discarded close to nearby railroad tracks.

Christian was held in the house for an additional four days. She was repeatedly raped and beaten. Cleaning chemicals were poured down her throat and her breasts were cut off. Police later found her body in a trash can where she had been left to die.

Lemaricus Davidson, 25, faces a total of 46 charges. Davidson was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Letalvis Cobbins, 24, faces a total of 46 charges. Cobbins was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

George Thomas, 24, faces a total of 46 charges. Thomas was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Vanessa Coleman faces 40 Tennessee state charges. Coleman was indicted on 12 counts Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 1 count Premeditated Murder of Christian only, 1 count Especially Aggravated Robbery of Newsom only, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts of aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom and 2 Counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Eric Boyd, 24, also arrested in connection with the fatal carjacking, only faces federal charges as an accessory after the fact. He was not indicted by Knox county grand jury.

The Vanguard News Network will be sponsoring a public demonstration in Knoxville in the coming months to bring national attention to these crimes and the controlled media and local official's attempted cover up of the dangers of diversity.

More info about this rally can be found here at VNN Forum:
Channon Christian & Chris Newsom Memorial Rally

Mestizos Riot in downtown Watsonville

2007-03-29T09:31:00.000-07:00

According to the Watsonville Register Pajaronian: " One man was seriously injured and four others were detained Wednesday following a street brawl between about 20 young men in downtown Watsonville. "

Strangely, they prefered to designate the incident "a huge fight". As usual the predominately mestizo nature of the crowd was left undisclosed.

"By the time police arrived at Carr Street and East Lake Avenue at 3:15 p.m., one man was crumpled on the ground beneath a tree and another victim was being carried away by others involved in the fight. Several others involved in the fight scattered through the neighborhood as four males hopped into a gray GMC Yukon and sped away, Watsonville police Sgt. Craig Tanaka said."

I think the bigger story here is the general incompetence and uselessness of the state police system. Apparently it is better suited to terrorizing private citizens for not wearing their bibs and seatbelts, than solving actual crime or keeping the peace. In any case, will the last Westerner to leave Watsonville please turn out the lights?